Originally Posted by
wantitall4moi
Big 10 is always over rated. Pac 12 was a luaghing stock but they had the same types of records aginst each other the big 10 had. Comparing big 10 out of conference you saw he same thing Pac 12 had, a bunch of losses. MSU lost both games they played against ACC schools. Ohio St blew out Duke but got beat by Kansas, Wisconsin lost to just about every legit team out of the Big 10 they played.
When one conference has 5 teams in the top 25 and uses that 'math' as a way to give them power rankings it is all flawed. Just another reason why comparative math doesnt work. Give the same types of rankings to Pac 12 schools and those teams beating up on each other would be just as relevant. But due to Pac 12 being west coast and the normal bias and the apparent weakness of them over all it doesnt happen.
So while NCAA basketball does ignore rankings to some extent and offers a tourny some conferences still get over ranked and some get under ranked and that also eventually ends up effecting schools who get in the tournament.
Its all subjective I am sure and even though they try to use math and all sorts of fancy initials to explain it is is still all based on biased comparative results that arent mathematical beyond calculating flawed numbers. Which anyone can do. The math doesnt really tell you which team is better, especially if they havent faced each other or common opponents. All it does it take comparative numbers and plug them in, and since everyone has the same flawed data is usually works out to similar results.
But when you look a the bracket over all you se a clear cut advantage for the stronger teams on the right side of the page. Because if youre a big time Syracuse guy or believe their record they have a cakewalk into the final 4. The best team they will face will be Vanderbilt, and that is if vandy doesnt pull another choke job. So to make the final Syr will only have to beat Kentucky. Kentucky on the other hand will have to face Duke or baylor and then Syr. Syr has no one of Duke or baylors caliber in their bracket.
The botton is even worse. While MSU is a bad one sed they stillhave a lot of hard games or potential hard games. Louville is no cake walk, hell neither is memphis. If they get passed those two they then have to face either Missouri or Marquette. Missouri actually has an easier road than MSU does. They just have to beat Marquette and then MSU if MSU gets that far.
Midwest is a joke. UNC or Kansas thats it, neither have any real tests, other than maybe Georgetown who can steal a game here or there. But UNC has a cake walk into the elite 8. But ironically that also gives a weak georgetown team a punchers chance because that bracket is a joke. So they steal the bottom from Kansas and UNC goes braindead you have G town with a couple thefts in the final 4.
So like I say they could have swiched a few teams up here or there to even it out just a little bit. But I think they do it on purpose to give tems like Gtown a chance to 'shock' the world by stealing two games and making a deep run. Vandy as well I suppose because they really only have to beat Syracuse on that upper right to make it as well. Which shows that right side of the bracket is the one that could get all the 'cinderella' love. Left side not so much, because even if a big seed gets upset that upset team has a tough game next round.