The more people are intimidated not to do something, the more they want to do it. Especially when it comes to something such as speech.
I realize they want to make an example out of him, but it's a dangerous path to go down, criminalizing words.
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
02-03-12 11:27 AM #1
Doesn't putting a guy on trial(J Terry)for insulting someone just breed more hatred?
-
02-03-12 12:14 PM #2
Mixed feelings really.
On the one hand "racially aggravated" speech is potentially criminal behaviour according to UK/EU law.
On the other the case would never go to court if it was an incident on the street between two unknown people.
The criminalising words aspect is interesting as to where you draw the line. Inciting violence or terrorism, for instance, would be a criminal offence just about everywhere.
-
02-03-12 12:18 PM #3
England's Brave John Terry is old and slow. He should be nowhere near England's 2012 Euro team.
As for the trial if you're gonna racially abuse someone then you deserve the worst.
-
02-03-12 12:56 PM #4
We have the right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and to not be called names
Originally Posted by RubberKettle
Sounds weird
Reply With Quote