1. 01-13-12 06:34 PM #1
    iifold
    Update your status
    iifold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-25-10
    Posts: 11,111
    Betpoints: 1774

    Correlated Hoop Parlays in SBR Book...

    Last week I tried to parlay the T-Wolves and over and it wouldn't let me...

    Last night I put in this and it was allowed...

    PARLAY (2 TEAMS)
    [805] WASHINGTON +12½-110
    [805] TOTAL o185½-110
    (WASHINGTON vrs PHILADELPHIA)

    300.00 / 780.00

    What is the rule???
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 01-13-12 06:39 PM #2
    iifold
    Update your status
    iifold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-25-10
    Posts: 11,111
    Betpoints: 1774

    Guess they will let you do anything with the Wizards

    Already down 10...
    Points Awarded:

    InTheDrink gave iifold 22 SBR Point(s) for this post.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 01-13-12 07:03 PM #3
    InTheDrink
    Drinker of the Year
    InTheDrink's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-23-09
    Posts: 23,983
    Betpoints: 527

    foldii there's your points and a little vig for ya

    Hit it BIG playing blackjack lol
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 01-13-12 07:05 PM #4
    benjy
    Untitled
    benjy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-19-09
    Posts: 2,158
    Betpoints: 2882

    Aren't dogs covering typically correlated with unders not overs?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 01-13-12 07:16 PM #5
    iifold
    Update your status
    iifold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-25-10
    Posts: 11,111
    Betpoints: 1774

    Quote Originally Posted by benjy View Post
    Aren't dogs covering typically correlated with unders not overs?
    Maybe this is why...

    Not sure what the Wolves were last week when I tried... (think they were slight favorites)

    A case can be made for a shitty team like the Wizards to cover, they would need a great night offensively...

    The Under/Dog correlation would seem to work better in football I think, where teams are clear cut "offensive" and "defensive" teams...

    Anyways, I was just looking for the "rule", not trying to argue a point either way...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Top
« Previous Thread | Players Talk | Next Thread »