1. #1
    ebbearsfb1
    ebbearsfb1's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-07-08
    Posts: 18,815
    Betpoints: 1694

    streak for the cash... big juice on there

    sharks -205...

    never seen one that on before on espn

  2. #2
    yisman
    yisman's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 75,682
    Betpoints: 246162

    I have. Many times.

  3. #3
    ebbearsfb1
    ebbearsfb1's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-07-08
    Posts: 18,815
    Betpoints: 1694

    how does it usually turn out?

    big juice wins?

  4. #4
    ehp6737
    ehp6737's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-11-08
    Posts: 4,185
    Betpoints: 32

    Quote Originally Posted by ebbearsfb1 View Post
    how does it usually turn out?

    big juice wins?
    Nope. SM hits these underdogs atleast 50% IMO. I've made good money over time taking the ML dog in these types of props on SFTC. Especially during baseball season. streakmaster is very sharp

  5. #5
    ebbearsfb1
    ebbearsfb1's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-07-08
    Posts: 18,815
    Betpoints: 1694

    thats what i thought...
    usually there is a reason a large juice is on there..

    same thing with spread if i see a + 6 or 7 on there.. usually a good idea to take the dog.. unless injury or something

  6. #6
    k13
    k13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-16-10
    Posts: 17,527
    Betpoints: 1710

    streak4cash is sharp

  7. #7
    yisman
    yisman's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 75,682
    Betpoints: 246162

    Underdogs do not hit anywhere near 50%, but betting big ML underdogs that are posted on SftC is profitable, I believe.

  8. #8
    ebbearsfb1
    ebbearsfb1's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-07-08
    Posts: 18,815
    Betpoints: 1694

    yea thats what ehp said... sounds good have to check it out

  9. #9
    yisman
    yisman's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 75,682
    Betpoints: 246162

    Quote Originally Posted by ebbearsfb1 View Post
    yea thats what ehp said... sounds good have to check it out
    No, ehp said underdogs hit at "at least 50", which is not true.

  10. #10
    ehp6737
    ehp6737's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-11-08
    Posts: 4,185
    Betpoints: 32

    Quote Originally Posted by yisman View Post
    No, ehp said underdogs hit at "at least 50", which is not true.
    Really? Can you show me where you're getting your supporting data? Because I was charting it for 4 months over the spring and summer and head to head dogs were hitting at 49.8%. And that's not covering a spread 49.8% of the time, that was winning outright, at +110 or better (I only used games where the dog was atleast +110). I was only betting +EV lines. So I'm basing it on a rather small sample size of only about 4 months, where as sftc has been around for a few years now, so maybe not 50% for the entire history of stfc but who knows. What i do know is it is a very profitable angle.

    Tonight's a perfect example. Colo closed at about +175 and it looks like there going to win

  11. #11
    yisman
    yisman's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 75,682
    Betpoints: 246162

    Quote Originally Posted by ehp6737 View Post
    Really? Can you show me where you're getting your supporting data? Because I was charting it for 4 months over the spring and summer and head to head dogs were hitting at 49.8%. And that's not covering a spread 49.8% of the time, that was winning outright, at +110 or better (I only used games where the dog was atleast +110). I was only betting +EV lines. So I'm basing it on a rather small sample size of only about 4 months, where as sftc has been around for a few years now, so maybe not 50% for the entire history of stfc but who knows. What i do know is it is a very profitable angle.
    Uh, how is that "at least 50%"? Even your small sample size disagrees with your statement.

    I have been playing SftC since the beginning and have been tracking various angles for a while now.

    It is simply not true that underdogs win "at least 50%" of the time.

    I agree that it's profitable. But you're exaggerating it.

  12. #12
    ebbearsfb1
    ebbearsfb1's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-07-08
    Posts: 18,815
    Betpoints: 1694

    Well eph said 50% of the time on streak for the cash... in the above post

  13. #13
    yisman
    yisman's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 75,682
    Betpoints: 246162

    Right, and I'm telling you that's not true. Underdogs do not win 50% of the time on streak for the cash.

  14. #14
    ebbearsfb1
    ebbearsfb1's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-07-08
    Posts: 18,815
    Betpoints: 1694

    Okay well if ur tracking what's the percents ya got?

  15. #15
    Preston09
    You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?
    Preston09's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-19-09
    Posts: 1,834
    Betpoints: 36

    It was a close game. Shoulda been a dog winner!

Top