Originally Posted by
Daveo
Let's say over the course of one sports season, you placed a total of 200 bets. You're using a labby system, so your wagers are variable based on the labby. Let's say if you added up all the wagers in that season, the total wagered was $8000. This means that the average wager was $8000 / 200 bets = $40 per bet.
Now, if you were to go back into that same season and start over again and simply wager $40 per bet instead of running a labby line, shouldn't the end result (your profit / loss) be almost the same as when you used the labby? There would be some differences depending on good or bad streaks, but if you average it out over an entire season, shouldn't the end result be very similar, considering that the average amount wagered per bet ($40) is the same?