[mh217]

was lucky to hit this live line play..but its about time ponder made me back some money after all he cost me at FSU

<CENTER>Singles Bet for Bet Offer: Packers v Vikings



<TABLE border=0><CAPTION>Singles Bet Summary</CAPTION><TBODY><TR><TH>Date</TH><TH>Time</TH><TH>Bet Type</TH><TH>Selection</TH><TH>Odds</TH><TH>Stake</TH><TH>Refund</TH><TH>Win</TH><TH>Status</TH></TR><TR><TD>Oct 23,2011</TD><TD>15:55</TD><TD>Spread Winner</TD><TD>Vikings +7½</TD><TD noWrap align=right>-115</TD><TD align=right>800.00</TD><TD align=right>0.00</TD><TD align=right>1495.66</TD><TD align=middle>Processed</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE border=0><CAPTION>Match Information</CAPTION><TBODY><TR><TH>Sport</TH><TH>Competition</TH><TH>Match Name</TH><TH>Match Date</TH><TH>Match Time</TH><TH>Match Result</TH></TR><TR><TD>American Football</TD><TD>LIVE BETTING - American Football</TD><TD>Packers v Vikings</TD><TD>Oct 23,2011</TD><TD align=middle>15:15</TD><TD align=middle>33-27 </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>
<!--CO=04:TT=281.732:PT=15.337:CT=209.213:QT =57.116:ET=56.130:ST=0.066
QC=010:SB=01983:SC=064/0:RC=053:FL=47:HI=1:FI=0-->

[gimpy]

I took the over and cashed big

[mh217]

i had the over 1st q as well

[gimpy]

Nice catch mh

[RonPaul2008]

Yea the packers ****** me over too.. They ****** over a lot of people actually... 88% of the public was on them and 90% of parlays and teasers had packers in them too... So, you were definitely not the only one that suffered from this if that makes you feel better. Just get your mind cleared up and look at tomorrow or take a week off. Trust me I am still pist I would have won $18,000 tonight

Packer teasers won

[jjgold]

Why guys put all this money on one game is crazy, yes Packer should of covered easy
'
They let up a lot...lets regroup and stop betting beyond your means

The thing is even when you guys hit big bets all your eventually going to do is lose it on another big bet

[wtf]

i do not want to gloat

but damn this had OVER written all over it

[thebestthereis]

Always wait for the correct late-breaking inside information before maxing out, those games you can step out and pound with the utmost confidence.

[nyed1010]

keep your head up. This will cheer you up. When I'm feeling down, I watch youtube videos of baby animals.

[wquine]

lol @ nyed . but seriously, never take a team that is going against an team that is improving at QB and considering the pack had a bye to look forward to is also noteworthy as well as being a division opponent all made this a vikings play for me.

[Coming Back!]

Great point JJ. That's exactly what happened to me. I should of learned my lesson by now, been doing this long enough

[Coming Back!]

Its a really tough loss, you lost a shit ton of money, but hopefully you learned an important lesson too.

You cant keep going all in or betting bigger then you can afford to. Yes, you can hit once or twice. Hell, you can even have a sick month or two. But eventually, if you are betting that high of a % of your roll, there is literally a 100% chance that you will lose. Everyone goes through losing streaks. Even the best cappers in the world have bad months. If you keep betting such high amounts that are pretty much your entire roll, you WILL lose it.

I have been in your shoes. I used to bet decent amounts, do well, think that im the shit, and then have all-ins and huge bets to try to double up real quick. and when i lost, i figured, shit, gotta get it back asap. and all of a sudden you are buried. And then i realized, shit, the ONLY reason im down is units. im hitting a great %, but losing literally all my big plays.

I know this loss will sting, and you might have to take some time off, but come back and use units next time. Personally for me, i flat bet 1 unit on everything. no matter how much i like it. you'd be surprised at the results. yes, you wont make as much money as an all in win, but you sure as hell wont have nights like today either. And id rather win a little/lose a little at a time then have to deal with losing the entire bank roll in a day, wouldnt you?

Anyways, hopefully you realize that its only money and there are much more important things. and next time, hopefully you have a lot better money management, cause that really is the biggest difference by far between a degen loser and a succesful gambler. good luck bro

100% Thx

[nomar122977]

we all lost on em man

[PackerBacker]

Coming Back, try to get some cash so you can finish the football season. You will be misssing out on a lot of football. I know you can build the bankroll back up. Do you have anything you can sell? Screw the bills!

[Lo-CalDallasBuKe]

Sorry to hear that but woohoo Vikes!!

[stevenash]

Maxed all 4 of my online accounts on the Packers at -7.5.

Squarest play on the board, shame on you, and shame on you for going all in.

[upscope]

Anybody that chooses to go all in on a double digit road fav in the NFL doesn't deserve to have any money anyhow.

[stevenash]

DD dogs at home is one of the best NFL bets going.
Been like that forever, read somewhere DD home bow wows cover like two thirds of the time.

[Powderguy]

good stuff

[Coming Back!]

TE=upscope;12028603]Anybody that chooses to go all in on a double digit road fav in the NFL doesn't deserve to have any money anyhow.[/QUOTE]
So dumb. Looked pretty good when Pack were up by 13 w the ball, didn't it. If u want to say it's dumb to bet a ton of $$$ on a game bc anything could happen. Fine. But ur theory is garbage, anybody watching w a brain knows GB should of covered easily

[jstblaze]

The main point here is never going all in.

As a bucnh of have said, the game looked good half way through, so neither side of this game was really that solid.

I lost a hundo on the packers, my bet amount for all games, but won 7 out of 10 of my plays, so get a small bump in bankroll.

I always have action, but never have to wake up and feel sick ever anymore.

Over the last 4 months i have had small ups and downs, but have progressively turned 500 into 5000, started out betting 40-50 a play and once i hit 3 grand i upped it to 80-100 a game.

i am a recreational gambler, but love to have action, so figurei might as well do it correctly even if it is at a small level.

[Riceboi]

The main point here is never going all in.

As a bucnh of have said, the game looked good half way through, so neither side of this game was really that solid.

I lost a hundo on the packers, my bet amount for all games, but won 7 out of 10 of my plays, so get a small bump in bankroll.

I always have action, but never have to wake up and feel sick ever anymore.

Over the last 4 months i have had small ups and downs, but have progressively turned 500 into 5000, started out betting 40-50 a play and once i hit 3 grand i upped it to 80-100 a game.

i am a recreational gambler, but love to have action, so figurei might as well do it correctly even if it is at a small level.

wow good shit man. Were you betting MLB over the last 4 months?

[upscope]

TE=upscope;12028603]Anybody that chooses to go all in on a double digit road fav in the NFL doesn't deserve to have any money anyhow.

So dumb. Looked pretty good when Pack were up by 13 w the ball, didn't it. If u want to say it's dumb to bet a ton of $$$ on a game bc anything could happen. Fine. But ur theory is garbage, anybody watching w a brain knows GB should of covered easily[/quote]

And it looked pretty good for the Vikings UP 4 @ the half getting 11 didn't it??

Should have covered easily??
I can just as easily say the Vikings "should" have won outright. They were driving for the game winning score.
If I had all the $$ back from all my bets that "should have" won I certainly wouldn't be here right now. If the Pack did cover I could argue that the Vikings "should have" covered based on the fact they were UP 17-13 @ the half getting 11. That's 3 scores. Bottom line is the game is 60 minutes not 50 minutes & the Vikings got the $$.

You must be part of the large group scratching their head in amazement that the square play of laying 11 on the road in a divisional rivalry game didn't actually get there??
GL laying 11 on the road in the future. Especially in one of the more bitter rivalries in all of sports

Instead of whining about "should have" covered you should actually be admitting you learned your lesson. You won't learn your lesson though I'm almost certain you'll be first in line next time the 11 point road fav pops UP.
I think there's one tonight actually?? Go for it pal....Lay the double digits tonight on the road w/ Balt??

[Madison]

Green bay screwed me last yr with detroit.. and this yr its against ponder and company

Please never mention this again. I had them tesaed last year in that game +3.5 for a large bet. Early in the game he scrambles for the first down and decides to try and get a couple extra yards. I'm screaming at the TV go down go down, NOPE, BOOM, and well you know the rest of the story.

[Vaughany]

Jesus, is that money you can affors to lose? Does losing 13k affect your quality of life, or does it just affect your mood because, hey it's 13k, but there's still plenty more where that came from?

Alright big timer!

[Vaughany]

Ponder didnt ruin your life...you making the decision to go all-in on one play ruined your life! If you can't control your bankroll then you shouldnt be gambling. Betting 101

[Vaughany]

The main point here is never going all in.

[cant call it]

Maybe it was really adrian peterson with his 175 yards

[wesleypotter]

I know the feeling

93551878-1 10/23/11 3:57pm $40.00 $1,195.54 $0.00 Loss 5 Team Parlay
Win 10/23/11 4:05pm NFL Football 415 Kansas City Chiefs +3½ -120* vs Oakland Raiders
Win 10/23/11 4:05pm NFL Football 417 Pittsburgh Steelers -4 -110* vs Arizona Cardinals
Win 10/23/11 4:15pm NFL Football 420 Dallas Cowboys -15 +105* vs St. Louis Rams
Loss 10/23/11 4:15pm NFL Football 421 Green Bay Packers -11 +105* vs Minnesota Vikings
Win 10/23/11 8:30pm NFL Football 424 New Orleans Saints -15 +110* vs Indianapolis Colts

93519974-1 10/23/11 12:48pm $15.00 $448.33 $0.00 Loss 5 Team Parlay
Win 10/23/11 4:05pm NFL Football 415 Kansas City Chiefs +3½ -120* vs Oakland Raiders
Win 10/23/11 4:05pm NFL Football 417 Pittsburgh Steelers -4 -110* vs Arizona Cardinals
Win 10/23/11 4:15pm NFL Football 420 Dallas Cowboys -15 +105* vs St. Louis Rams
Loss 10/23/11 4:15pm NFL Football 421 Green Bay Packers -11 +105* vs Minnesota Vikings
Win 10/23/11 8:30pm NFL Football 424 New Orleans Saints -15 +110* vs Indianapolis Colts

[4TH AND STUPID]

packers were public play #1 with 90% on the packers spread....


i dont normally use the term square but you NEVER , EVER bet 1) your entire stack 2) on a play that has 90% of the public on the same spread.

[Stevedore]

The Pack have a problem with taking big leads, and then not extending them. Happened today against the Vikes. Ther lead didn't disappear last week against the Rams, but they didn't score at all in the 2nd half. They need to keep the foot on the gas pedal even when they have a decent sized lead, just like the Saints did today.

I agree with you. The head coach likes to got to the run game with a big lead. He'll do this every time, starting early in the 4th, problem is their running game never clicks till the end of the year.

[drfunkmaster]

Please never mention this again. I had them tesaed last year in that game +3.5 for a large bet. Early in the game he scrambles for the first down and decides to try and get a couple extra yards. I'm screaming at the TV go down go down, NOPE, BOOM, and well you know the rest of the story.

I will try not to mention it again. but that day i thought to myself i am done gambling but here i am today. And that was a day i had so many parlays and detroit sucked and they could not punch it in!!! i wonder whats gonna happen in tonights game??

[D3 Mighty Ducks]

You can say all you want about Chris Ponder, but he does have the worlds most beautiful girlfriend!

http://frathousesports.com/florida-s...acie-pictures/

Damn she a fukking bomb shell

[blue chip]

That sucks. You'll get er back bro!

Ah how sweet of you to stroke his sorry ass. We always get our losses back, dont we Bigday? That's why the sport books and our locals are on welfare.

[Machine Choice]

Damn she a fukking bomb shell

Here's Matthew Stafford's girlfriend on the left: