Obviously, in the grand scheme of things, this is not of great importance, and even for many posters here, on this very specialized site, strictly of secondary (or worse) importance.
But for some, it is paramount. Their "pursuit of happiness" as guaranteed in the Constitution depends of being able to bet on sports, preferably online, and into a more secure and stable environment than books located in Wild West type banana republics. (Excuse my frankness, residents or patriots of the Caribbean nations that host bookie joints.)
Clearly, Pres Obama will not be as militantly opposed to sports betting as would a Pres McCain. Mainly because his core support does not rest among Bible Belt fundamentalist Christians, who wish to impose thier morality on the rest of us.
I think there would be a 50-50 chance that an Obama administration would OK sports betting - in a very limited manner at first, but widening it later, as the taxing of such funds proves a neat windfall.
Maybe not in the first term, but in the second. Or even the first, if the endless quest for tax monies to support the many diverse interest groups in our faltering republic continue to squawk like hungry birds, for more and more pieces of flesh, to be washed down with the blood of taxpayers.
Obama will not end this rampant and mindless American imperialism (guess how many countries there are that currently host, or suffer, US bases or military personnel?)
Not unless he wants to become "another JFK," in more ways than one.
Mickey Mouse could win this election by a write-in landslide, and the Military/Industrial Complex with their army of lobbyists will continue to rule.
And it wil take huge infusions of tax dollars to keep it all afloat, until the final sad denouement sometime a bit later this century.
Sports betting and online casinos are a logical source for funds. "Painless taxes" is how it may be billed, as no one really gives a sh1t about insane gamblers.
There may be a lot of camouflage bull about "raising funds to help addicted gamblers" or "closing an overseas loophole that allows terrorists to mask their money transfers in gambling funds." Bull like that.
The bottom line will be to get avaricious bureaucratic hands on all that lovely money.
What about the protests from the NBA and NFL? (I suspect that, at first, college sports will still be excluded from the equation.)
It will be pointed up by secret admin spokesmen that the NFL plays in countires (England, Mexico) where betting on the games is legal. And that a casino owner has an interest in an NBA team. And none of this ever troubled these sports corporations.
Negociations will be undertaken with NBA, NFL, MLB etc to insure that they get their cut of the fat betting pie. (Of course, a small portion of the funds will hypocritally go to run commerucials telling fukked up bettors to get thee to a Gamblers Anonymous meeting, but that's just typical American Puritanism speaking, out of both sides of its mouth, as usual).
Personally, I think if Obama is elected to a second term we will have some form of sports betting lagalized in the USA.
Imperialist entities simply need huge quantities of capital to just stay even. And sports bet funds are right now mainly untaxed. And unregulated.
Mo' money, please. The plaintive cry of deathbed political entities. Just ask Rome (ca 100 AD) and the Soviet Union (ca 1985 AD). And many other examples from that bizarre movie called World History.
Play ball! And get your bets down, gentlemen!