[UntilTheNDofTimE]

Worse are stupid cross posted threads.

Whats worse is someone as intelligent as yourself wasting his time belittling apparent morons on a forum to increase his ego.


To all. My question actually has nothing to do with repubs vs dems now that i think about it for more than 2 seconds. I wasnt trying to portray that one should only be republican.

I guess my simple question shud of been. Why do we allow moronic public assistance that drains our wallets?

[AribaAriba]

Almost half of the budget is spent on American security, social assistance doesnt drain the system...

[Naz18]

Anyone that thinks voting Republican is going to get you a smaller government is totally clueless....

[The Madcap]

How is it that the 17 countries below the US manage to feel safe when their military budgets COMBINED don't total the USA.

WOW.

I've seen a lot of illogical rhetorical arguments here at SBR, and this is by far the dumbest and most infantile.

If you can't see the inherent differences between the logistics/concerns in the USA's defense needs and the likes of Australia/Spain/Brazil, well then you should probably just refrain from making any sort of argument regarding foreign policy.

[andywend]

In Costa rica, we have no welfare. No government assistance. No food stamps. No rent assistance. People work. You don't see a ton of homeless people.

The sense of entitlement that many people have is just sad. Nobody owes you a damn thing. You work for 40 years for somebody? Awesome. Why should he have to continue paying you for the rest of your life? People retire too early. What's the age now, 62? Screw that. You still have ~20 years left on your life. If anybody is responsible for you, it should be your family. Not your former employer. Not your government.

ChiliDog, it used to be this way in America until everything changed about 50-60 years ago. When people reached retirement age, they did NOT whine and beg the government for financial/medical assistance. Instead, seniors moved in with their children who helped assist with financial and medical needs and medical costs were quite reasonable because EVERYBODY who received medical services paid for them in cash or some form of credit.

Unfortunately, all of the people who "came off the boat" in the late 1800's/early 1900's who kissed the ground upon arrival and were willing to work their tails off have been replaced with a new set of immigrants who REFUSE to speak English, breed like absolute rabbits and go straight to the social services office the moment they turn 18.

While I sure do wish I could press a magic button and make all of the deadbeat leeches who collect welfare simply disappear, I can't blame them for not wanting to put in an honest days work when instead they can sit home and collect a welfare check.

WORK SUCKS and if sitting on your ass pays better, why not do it?

The problem is the liberal democratic politicians who are more than willing to send the welfare checks right to their door every week in return for their vote every 2 or 4 years.

Nothing has changed when it comes to the United States being the greatest country in the world. What has changed is the work ethic and character of people living in the U.S.. Diversity used to be my country's greatest strength and now its my country's GREATEST WEAKNESS.

I can only imagine how the minimum wage Taco Bell/McDonald's worker must feel when they talk with their neighboor next door who collects welfare and makes 2X as much as the minimum wage worker with better medical benefits.

My solution is simple:

Immediately stop sending money to people who don't work and use those funds to financially assist those that do work. Who the heck can live on $7.25/hour? The people who are currently collecting a welfare check for doing absolutely nothing would either get a job or turn to crime.

Those that turn to crime need to be punished to the fullest extent the law allows. Those that choose full time work would continue to collect some form of extra financial assistance to pay for medical insurance, etc.

Liberal democrats call this cold-hearted but "sane" individuals view it as simple common sense.

[SargeantHooker]

WOW.

I've seen a lot of illogical rhetorical arguments here at SBR, and this is by far the dumbest and most infantile.

If you can't see the inherent differences between the logistics/concerns in the USA's





defense needs and the likes of Australia/Spain/Brazil, well then you should probably just refrain from making any sort of argument regarding foreign policy.

This

[SargeantHooker]

Thank you Andy for joining in. I was waiting for someone from the forum with your level of thought and understanding to chime in. Well said sir.

[The Madcap]

Almost half of the budget is spent on American security, social assistance doesnt drain the system...

WRONG.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...us/budget.html

Actual Numbers for 2010 Budget....


Nat'l Defense spending: $722 billion
Social Security: $724 billion
Medicare: $462 billion
Income Security (IE: Welfare): $629 billion
Other health spending (IE: Medicaid): $386 billion

Don't be an asshole, get the facts.

And the facts are that we are spending more on social security alone than defense. When you combine the other programs listed, we are spending TRIPLE on "social assistance" than what we are spending on defense.

Try to check some sources in the future and you won't look like such an idiot.

[BrigadierPudding]

Income security isn't entirely welfare. It's a little more nuanced than that. Tax credits - earned income, child credit, etc - make up a large portion of that figure. Federal and military retirement funds alone account for over $120 billion. That's not welfare.

[The Madcap]

Income security isn't entirely welfare. It's a little more nuanced than that. Tax credits - earned income, child credit, etc - make up a large portion of that figure. Federal and military retirement funds alone account for over $120 billion. That's not welfare.

You're missing the point.

[jw]

Anyone that thinks voting Republican is going to get you a smaller government is totally clueless....

[Flashmo]

There's no such thing as a Democrat anymore-they're all progressives, socialists and communists....

[King Mayan]

ChiliDog, it used to be this way in America until everything changed about 50-60 years ago. When people reached retirement age, they did NOT whine and beg the government for financial/medical assistance. Instead, seniors moved in with their children who helped assist with financial and medical needs and medical costs were quite reasonable because EVERYBODY who received medical services paid for them in cash or some form of credit.

Unfortunately, all of the people who "came off the boat" in the late 1800's/early 1900's who kissed the ground upon arrival and were willing to work their tails off have been replaced with a new set of immigrants who REFUSE to speak English, breed like absolute rabbits and go straight to the social services office the moment they turn 18.

While I sure do wish I could press a magic button and make all of the deadbeat leeches who collect welfare simply disappear, I can't blame them for not wanting to put in an honest days work when instead they can sit home and collect a welfare check.

WORK SUCKS and if sitting on your ass pays better, why not do it?

The problem is the liberal democratic politicians who are more than willing to send the welfare checks right to their door every week in return for their vote every 2 or 4 years.

Nothing has changed when it comes to the United States being the greatest country in the world. What has changed is the work ethic and character of people living in the U.S.. Diversity used to be my country's greatest strength and now its my country's GREATEST WEAKNESS.

I can only imagine how the minimum wage Taco Bell/McDonald's worker must feel when they talk with their neighboor next door who collects welfare and makes 2X as much as the minimum wage worker with better medical benefits.

My solution is simple:

Immediately stop sending money to people who don't work and use those funds to financially assist those that do work. Who the heck can live on $7.25/hour? The people who are currently collecting a welfare check for doing absolutely nothing would either get a job or turn to crime.

Those that turn to crime need to be punished to the fullest extent the law allows. Those that choose full time work would continue to collect some form of extra financial assistance to pay for medical insurance, etc.

Liberal democrats call this cold-hearted but "sane" individuals view it as simple common sense.

too bad those immigrant off the boat, where real immigrants( your family).....

While the lazy brownies are actually from America.....

and what is it?? Are mexicans leeches or muthafukkas that break their backs , in turn take caspers jobs!!!!

No way you're well off andywend... Rich muthafukkas don't have hate....they are out there living life......

You are a typical entitled hypocrite repub, that hates everything as long it doesn't affect you...

[jgilmartin]

Democrats are going to tell you how to spend your money.
Republicans are going to tell you what to do in your private life.
**** them both.

[wtf]

Whats worse is someone as intelligent as yourself wasting his time belittling apparent morons on a forum to increase his ego. To all. My question actually has nothing to do with repubs vs dems now that i think about it for more than 2 seconds. I wasnt trying to portray that one should only be republican. I guess my simple question shud of been. Why do we allow moronic public assistance that drains our wallets?

so why is durito intelligent, cause he said everyone else is dumb?

he is a two bit shill living in the worlds most impoverished nation, yea he is a genius- fukin loser

you are fine united dont let that fukin peasant rain on your parade

[MUHerd37]

How is all that Obama change doing for ya Democrats? The guy has no clue whatsoever. I wasn't sure that the economy could get any worse after what Bush did. Boy was I ever fukkin wrong. I guess being a community organizer doesn't prepare you for being President huh?