[SBR Lou]

So many things we cannot depend on with our growing economic woes and the genuine state of panic we as American citizens are enduring, in these testing times for us both financially and spiritually, is there anything we can rely on more than USC -42 today?

[blackNgoldjuice]

Isnt there a rule to never take a 42 point favorite? 14 guys on defense for Wazzu. That is hard to imagine in this day and age

[SBR Lou]

Isnt there a rule to never take a 42 point favorite?

Maybe so, but if it looks and quacks like a duck, IMO then it's a duck bud. Good luck if you disagree.

[durito]

10/14/2008 by ONLINE at 06:45 AM
[Ticket #: 46036909] STRAIGHT BET
10/18/2008 @ 12:30 PM CFB [348] WASH ST +43-110

[blackNgoldjuice]

I am not touching this game, but I understand where you are coming from. I have teased Wazzu up over 35 a couple times this year and they still don't cover

[Justin7]

Taking road favs of over 40 is a terrible idea generally.

[SBR Lou]

Taking road favs of over 40 is a terrible idea generally.

Normally I only lay 37 on the road, this is just an exception I made.

Good luck guys.

[NEP Dynasty]

USC could win 84-0

[SlickFazzer]

USC could win 84-0

[Iwinyourmoney]

There are way better bets on to be made, like LSU -3 or Texas, but laying so many points is nuts

[gm2022]

I think Wash St is 10 times worse than Standford was last year coming into this game! But both spreads our right at the same number!

[SlickFazzer]

It makes no sense to mess with this game.

[rm18]

play it at beted, parlay USC with the over

[durito]

play it at beted, parlay USC with the over

whats the parlay limit?

[rm18]

whats the parlay limit?

750

[Brady2Moss]

usc has no reason to run the score up

[rm18]

i am assuming they still let you do this, i got banned in March, also you could parlay the 1st half as well

[SBR Lou]

usc has no reason to run the score up

We'll see what goes down.

[onlooker]

I'm not betting the game, but I don't see USC covering that spread. They will probably win by 25/30.

[unde0087]

Wash st +42.5, USC will not cover

[ryanXL977]

slighty less easy than oregon state+25

[rm18]

Oregon St. beat WSU by 53 points

[ryanXL977]

there is no transverse prpoerty of sports, or transitive.

if usc beats ohio state by 30 and ohio state beats michigan by 30, doesnt mean usc will beat mich

teams have good days and bad

usc should not be favored by 43 pts on the road vs anybody. maybe 35, but not 43

[Brady2Moss]

I took WAS +43

[rm18]

But now they are down to the 3rd QB, it is just a question of strategy, if the objective was to cover USC could cover this thing over 85% of the time, just a question of if they go to backups at 31, 35, or 42 points, and whether the backups throw the ball much if at all.

[Brady2Moss]

USC cant do shit, they lose when they are insane favorites, They will probably lose this game ML those suckers.

[ryanXL977]

But now they are down to the 3rd QB, it is just a question of strategy, if the objective was to cover USC could cover this thing over 85% of the time, just a question of if they go to backups at 31, 35, or 42 points, and whether the backups throw the ball much if at all.

thats true
wazzou will probably l

[diogee]

What an ass whooping...569 yds to 114

[unde0087]

holy shit, Wash St. needs to play at the high school level

[Bread]

To answer the original question...I guess not!

[yisman]

I took WAS +43

USC knows a lot of ways to screw you over, Brady2Moss. Don't try them.

[SBR Lou]

Taking road favs of over 40 is a terrible idea generally.

Sample size of one, there was absolutely no value with laying over 40 in this instance. I know, I know...

Er, but a 69-0 ass whipping just feels so right...I'll go look at some road favorites for tomorrow to foolishy lay some points on...

[bmw530i]

Holy shit..... great pick CrazyL....

[MickChunky]

Hilyshit asswoopin u were right!

[pico]

what the **** happened in 3rd Q? they only scored 1 TD