[Bill Dozer]

One suggestions would be for the consensus percentages to be displayed on the front page next to the teams. Like it is in the old version. Instead of having to open a tab/drop down thing for each separate game. Thats kinda annoying.

We'll get that there. Expect to see it next month.

[Bill Dozer]

I posted on another thread my request to not neglect the old page till the new one has all tha bugs worked out. Line history on some games missing at old site but show up on beta if you do the "i" button.
Carl

Right, when changes happen in the feeds it take a lot of time to fix/update the old one. Manageability was one of the main reasons to rebuild. Hopefully the old one is fixed here shortly.

You also see the line history on the new SBRodds by 1-clicking the line. Correct? Thanks!

[Bill Dozer]

The line history is just a blank screen for me. Maybe it's my pc?

Bad: As Carl above me noted, when I click on line history it is just a blank screen, and this isn't just a one day event, I have had this problem since it was created.

this is new SBRodds beta right? The initial issue was the way we pulled the data to the website. We were hoping that was solid after a Tuesday AM update.

If you guys can email me Bill@sportsbookreview.com with a screenshot and the time when you get any page or pop up that comes up blank, it will be greatly appreciated. We can go back and look at it by time.

[Bill Dozer]

bump

[Carl 1326]

Bill, the new one click line history has never worked for me. It just comes up a blank screen every time. Is it working for anyone??? The "i" line history deal is working though. Not sure how to do that screen shot thing.
Carl

[rfr3sh]

New sbrodds pinnacle feed doesnt seem to work with soccer mls

also the scores seem to be wrong for many of the games but correct for others

IE. Newcastle and chelsea tied 2-2 however it is listed as 2-1
but villa/arsenal score is correct

finally, maybe the problem has to do with the fact that in the old sbrodds the home team was listed on top and in the new on they are on the bottom, so maybe the code is messing up if some of the old code was used

[Carl 1326]

Bill, I had some friends try the one click line history (by clicking the line under a book) and they also got "line history" and the rest of the screen is blank. Is this working for anyone???

The line histories from Pinnacle, for the MLB, on the old and new site Sunday were no where near the same. Since lines were missing from the old site I am assuming the beta site is more correct. But... I don't like the scroll feature for line histories on the Beta.

My request is still to not mess up the old site till you get the bugs worked out at the Beta.

I think the new site will be good once yall get it fine tuned.
Carl

[jjgold]

Guys are working as we speak in tech office on the product.

[Carl 1326]

That's great to hear JJ! I hope they can get the one click line history screen working soon.
Carl

[onlooker]

Bill, I had some friends try the one click line history (by clicking the line under a book) and they also got "line history" and the rest of the screen is blank. Is this working for anyone???

The line history popup works fine for me.

What browser you using, that might help them.

[Carl 1326]

I am using Flock. My friends use Explorer. Glad to hear it is working for someone Onlooker!
Carl

[Bill Dozer]

I am using Flock. My friends use Explorer. Glad to hear it is working for someone Onlooker!
Carl

Can you see them now Carl? Im not familiar with Flock. Please let us know. Thanks

The line histories from Pinnacle, for the MLB, on the old and new site Sunday were no where near the same. Since lines were missing from the old site I am assuming the beta site is more correct. But... I don't like the scroll feature for line histories on the Beta.

Pinnacle has a lot of 1 cent changes even inside of the time 15 seconds it takes us to get and display their line. The new odds pulls more updates. I'm guessing this is it but we are monitoring them as well. If you notice any differences you can record and ask us about, it would be appreciated.

[Bill Dozer]

At one point you said BetPhoenix would be back. I still don't see it.

They are available now.

[jjgold]

That's great to hear JJ! I hope they can get the one click line history screen working soon.
Carl

Carl you better off using firefox

[Flight]

Carl you better off using firefox

Fox 4 just released

http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/fx/

[SportsMushroom]

been checking out the beta, thumbs up guys its looking great but i have a couple of questions

1. is the consensus history still coming only from 5 dimes? are there plans to include consensus history from other books?

2. why is there no or minimal data on sports besides the 4 major league sports? like for example soccer and tennis? there is no data in the tennis section of sbr odds which is strange, why offer that option if its not going to work

[jjgold]

Mushroom give them time for other sports

5 Dimes will be looked into as soon as techs get in office

This product is on the rise

[SBR_John]

been checking out the beta, thumbs up guys its looking great but i have a couple of questions

1. is the consensus history still coming only from 5 dimes? are there plans to include consensus history from other books?

2. why is there no or minimal data on sports besides the 4 major league sports? like for example soccer and tennis? there is no data in the tennis section of sbr odds which is strange, why offer that option if its not going to work

1, Yes. This will get a lot better. The SBR book has 700 guys a day betting so there are stats there.

2. Good point. OK, we will get that right.

[Bill Dozer]

sportsmushroom,
We are making the betting percentages better and accurate now. They'll be there.

Check out soccer today. We moved the books with better soccer feeds to page 1 as we get the data from the other books.

[Bill Dozer]

The feedack after launch suggested guys and gals liked the harder grid lines. We just tweaked. Tell us what you think.

[Carl 1326]

Bill, thanks!!! My one click line history is now working on Flock. I was hoping it would be a non scrolling page like at the old site but... But Oh, my friend cant do the scroll on his iphone. Maybe he just can't figure out how to do it?

I might look into yalls Fox suggestion though?

Anyone using an iphone, or other smart phone, to look at the line histories????

That could be a big deal if folks can't use the new line history on their smart phones.
Carl

[Bluehorseshoe]

Any chance of seeing the juice on totals when you have "spread and totals" up??

[BetterBizness]

Why do the sites between them not have the same line histories... Many examples have been mentioned... My gut seems to say New SBR is more accurate.. but how is it even possible if you are polling from the same sources?

[Carl 1326]

BB, I also think the new site is more accurate. Bill explained why earlier.

Can anyone use their iphone to scroll and look at line history???
Carl

[hhsilver]

I like the beta a lot. thanks.

there is one thing I'd like to see changed. the way a row or column gets highlighted in yellow is very distracting. As far as I can tell, there is no way you can hi-lite a row and keep it that way. I'd rather have no hi-lite possibility than have it change every time I move the mouse. What's going on now makes it harder to focus on a game or games you are interested in than it would be with no 'yellow' rows/columns at all.

[rfr3sh]

Now we just need the %s on the main page and were pretty much set

[whitey]

Any chance of seeing the juice on totals when you have "spread and totals" up??

This is something we've talked about. I'm not sure if it will happen or not but if enough people want it maybe its something we can add.

[whitey]

Why do the sites between them not have the same line histories... Many examples have been mentioned... My gut seems to say New SBR is more accurate.. but how is it even possible if you are polling from the same sources?

There are many reasons, mostly due to the stability of the actual importing process. Sometimes the old system has small periods of time, 10 minutes without updates because of how the system is built. It's a flawed system, which is one of the reasons why we decided to rebuild everything from the ground up.

We're still tweaking a few things on the beta site, but for the most part the line histories should be more accurate.

[whitey]

I like the beta a lot. thanks.

there is one thing I'd like to see changed. the way a row or column gets highlighted in yellow is very distracting. As far as I can tell, there is no way you can hi-lite a row and keep it that way. I'd rather have no hi-lite possibility than have it change every time I move the mouse. What's going on now makes it harder to focus on a game or games you are interested in than it would be with no 'yellow' rows/columns at all.

If you click the check box on top that says "rot #" you can see a check box where the rotations use to be. Clicking that will keep the game highlighted, probably needs some work on the UI level but the feature works if you know about it.

[hhsilver]

If you click the check box on top that says "rot #" you can see a check box where the rotations use to be. Clicking that will keep the game highlighted, probably needs some work on the UI level but the feature works if you know about it.

Ok -- I had the ROT box checked because that's how I want it, but I now see I have Rot # in my setting - I suppose that's my default and i don't have to have the box checked on the main page. When I unchecked it, I saw the left side boxes and that they work to keep the games i want hi-lited.

However, is there any reason to have the darker yellow move from game to game as you move the mouse. I'll get used to it, but it seems annoying/distracting and I don't see a reason for it.

[whitey]

Ok -- I had the ROT box checked because that's how I want it, but I now see I have Rot # in my setting - I suppose that's my default and i don't have to have the box checked on the main page. When I unchecked it, I saw the left side boxes and that they work to keep the games i want hi-lited.

However, is there any reason to have the darker yellow move from game to game as you move the mouse. I'll get used to it, but it seems annoying/distracting and I don't see a reason for it.

You can use the "rot #" button on top of the page without going into your settings, once you check the games you can click rot back to see the rots. If you refresh the page or change url's you will loose the highlighted games, like i said the feature needs a little work

As far as the color is concerned, i'm not sure the reasoning behind that, maybe one of the graphics guys has an idea.

[LVHerbie]

Odds by month seems like a useful feature although if you click on it seems like you only get odds for April... Shouldn't this display the current month (or, better yet, the last thirty days)? How about an option to use this feature to retrieve historical data by month further back?

Also, come football season will the man page display multiply days? Not too much of a problem right now as you are only missing a couple games by having today's odds as the standard display but during football I think most are going to want all NFL and NCAA games displayed on a main page... Maybe a "week" or "all upcoming" button would be a good addition to today/yesterday/calender option that can be become the primary display during this period...

[LVHerbie]

You can use the "rot #" button on top of the page without going into your settings, once you check the games you can click rot back to see the rots. If you refresh the page or change url's you will loose the highlighted games, like i said the feature needs a little work

I didn't even realize this was a option until you described the process here... Seems like a really useful feature if the bugs get worked out especially if there is some way to prevent losing the highlighted selections due to refreshing the page...

[whitey]

Odds by month seems like a useful feature although if you click on it seems like you only get odds for April... Shouldn't this display the current month (or, better yet, the last thirty days)? How about an option to use this feature to retrieve historical data by month further back?

Not all parts of SBRForum have been replaced with the new odds engine. Once we finish with the grid the other parts will have some improvements.

Also, come football season will the man page display multiply days? Not too much of a problem right now as you are only missing a couple games by having today's odds as the standard display but during football I think most are going to want all NFL and NCAA games displayed on a main page... Maybe a "week" or "all upcoming" button would be a good addition to today/yesterday/calender option that can be become the primary display during this period...

Good point, I mean you can go to the individual league page and get all games that have lines posted, but NFL would only show up on the all page 2 days a week. I don't think there are any plans on changing the current method, to see NFL you'll need to click on the NFL league. The only different between the beta site and the old site is that during football season the old site would be the default page.

[venture]

We'll get that there. Expect to see it next month.

Glad to see the consensus will be up soon, that is one of the main reasons i use sbrodds over other sites. Also if possible knowing consensus of other sites or any brick and morder would be great.