1. #1
    jjgold
    jjgold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-20-05
    Posts: 388,190
    Betpoints: 10

    Is Vancouver A Lock Tonight??

    Home
    Game 7

    Is it a all in play?

  2. #2
    Wiggums5
    The Wiggler
    Wiggums5's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-05-10
    Posts: 2,409


  3. #3
    Tk Fo Sho
    Tk Fo Sho's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-04-10
    Posts: 212

    If chicago scores first, the game is over. The hawks are in Loungo's head. Hell, they are in all their heads...

  4. #4
    magynuck
    magynuck's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-17-09
    Posts: 891
    Betpoints: 3844

    looking forward to enjoying the game

  5. #5
    Ace_of_Spades
    Golazo De Riverrrr!
    Ace_of_Spades's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-14-09
    Posts: 13,518
    Betpoints: 79

    No way. Hawks clearly with the momentum.

  6. #6
    obamaismyuncle
    obamaismyuncle's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-31-08
    Posts: 17,801

    Canucks will win

  7. #7
    BIGDAY
    angelman.org
    BIGDAY's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 02-17-10
    Posts: 48,241
    Betpoints: 24866

    I like Chicago.

  8. #8
    BuckeyeT
    BuckeyeT's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-14-11
    Posts: 591
    Betpoints: 85

    This game is far from a lock.

    Yes the Canucks can win but anything can happen in a game 7.

    No way would i go all in on this game.

  9. #9
    ApricotSinner32
    ApricotSinner32's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-28-10
    Posts: 10,648
    Betpoints: 26

    You such thing as a lock guy

  10. #10
    obamaismyuncle
    obamaismyuncle's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-31-08
    Posts: 17,801

    gold is making one of my lock threads here, and letting others cap the game for him. he's either gonna play the Blackhawks or nothing..

  11. #11
    crjohnson32
    crjohnson32's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-16-10
    Posts: 989
    Betpoints: 237

    I'm on the Canucks for 10% of my BR. Line opened at -162, is now at -166. I'm 0-3 my last 3 NHL plays so this could be serious fade material.

  12. #12
    jjgold
    jjgold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-20-05
    Posts: 388,190
    Betpoints: 10

    A loss could set back Vancouver hockey for 20 years
    They are due for a strong game and win like 3-1, 4-2

  13. #13
    crjohnson32
    crjohnson32's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-16-10
    Posts: 989
    Betpoints: 237

    Quote Originally Posted by jjgold View Post
    A loss could set back Vancouver hockey for 20 years
    They are due for a strong game and win like 3-1, 4-2
    How much are you in for? What did you get in at? I wouldn't risk more than 20% of my BR on this the way Chicago has played, I'm in on it for 10%, which is still more than my typical bet.

  14. #14
    mrpooh
    mrpooh's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-12-11
    Posts: 558

    The only lock is Hawks TT over 2.5
    Did you see how Lou played in overtime on sunday? He is in the tank, and he can't even handle a puck anymore. Lots of rebound chances today. If the Sedin's wake up Van can win, but if they do, they will need 4+ goals to do so.

  15. #15
    Brewers in 7
    SBR owes me 45 points
    Brewers in 7's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-20-10
    Posts: 1,363
    Betpoints: 1303

    Vancouver is the better team by far, the goalie who is supposed to be the best in the game is playing dreadful right now, if Vancouver scores 1st theyll romp tonight.. but if they dont......

  16. #16
    bostonbruins
    bostonbruins's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-02-08
    Posts: 3,272

    Will be a 1 goal game, OT maybe

  17. #17
    Frattimore
    Frattimore's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-03-11
    Posts: 65

    nopeeeee

  18. #18
    crjohnson32
    crjohnson32's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-16-10
    Posts: 989
    Betpoints: 237

    Quote Originally Posted by jjgold View Post
    A loss could set back Vancouver hockey for 20 years
    They are due for a strong game and win like 3-1, 4-2
    Don't try to convince yourself this is an all in play, because it's not. In fact if you ask me there's no such thing as an all in play if you practice good BR management. I've lost 3 plays in a row, but in total that only accounts for under 25% of my BR. Some people lose 3-4 games in a row and lose their entire BR
    Last edited by crjohnson32; 04-26-11 at 08:17 AM.

  19. #19
    LChruscial85
    Tyler Bray to the Bills!
    LChruscial85's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-04-08
    Posts: 843
    Betpoints: 12

    I don't get how you can even think this game is a lock when Chicago has won the last 3 straight?! I like Vancouver to do the job, but there's better games to bet out there! No way in hell this game is a lock JJ! GL with your picks brother!

  20. #20
    crjohnson32
    crjohnson32's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-16-10
    Posts: 989
    Betpoints: 237

    Nice avatar LChruscail85! Who are the Bills picking on thursday?

  21. #21
    Vindicate
    Vindicate's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-28-10
    Posts: 536

    quality logic.

    Hawks win 3 in a row

    Vancouver is a lock

  22. #22
    d2bets
    d2bets's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-10-05
    Posts: 39,777
    Betpoints: 21665

    Seems more like a lock to lose. Like the Yankees against the Red Sox or the Cubs against the Marlins. Vancouver looks defeated already.

  23. #23
    Slovakhockey
    Slovakhockey's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-26-11
    Posts: 127
    Betpoints: 30

    I think the OVER is lock

  24. #24
    General Custer
    General Custer's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-16-11
    Posts: 210
    Betpoints: 15345

    Hawks got the experience playing in big games last year. Kane with the game winner in late 3rd/OT. Going to be a crippling loss for canucks fans

  25. #25
    PuckOff
    PuckOff's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-14-07
    Posts: 2,395
    Betpoints: 4352

    Quote Originally Posted by jjgold View Post
    A loss could set back Vancouver hockey for 20 years
    They are due for a strong game and win like 3-1, 4-2
    Can you please explain why you think this?

  26. #26
    PuckOff
    PuckOff's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-14-07
    Posts: 2,395
    Betpoints: 4352

    I hope Vancouver wins, but I think it's going to be a tough one for them. The Sedins need to start playing hockey.

  27. #27
    cloudagh
    cloudagh's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-08-07
    Posts: 486
    Betpoints: 100

    Now that the lock word was used, I think I have to stay away from this game.

  28. #28
    PuckOff
    PuckOff's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-14-07
    Posts: 2,395
    Betpoints: 4352

    Tough game to call for sure Cloudy.

  29. #29
    Rio DiNero
    using no way as way
    Rio DiNero's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-03-08
    Posts: 2,010
    Betpoints: 218

    Hawks have all the momentum, I wouldn't lay all the chalk on Vancouver with your money JJ.

  30. #30
    Wulfman14
    The Great Khali
    Wulfman14's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-24-10
    Posts: 8,869

    i like the canucks to win but i wouldnt bet on them at this price . if the line were -145 or something maybe. no chance of that though.

  31. #31
    Dabeergod
    Da Big D Boyz !!!
    Dabeergod's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-30-10
    Posts: 5,503
    Betpoints: 279

    Rolling with my hometown streaking Hawks in this one.

  32. #32
    LChruscial85
    Tyler Bray to the Bills!
    LChruscial85's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-04-08
    Posts: 843
    Betpoints: 12

    Quote Originally Posted by crjohnson32 View Post
    Nice avatar LChruscail85! Who are the Bills picking on thursday?
    seeing if they don't know how to draft I can't even make an educated guess....I'm hoping Von Miller, but knowing us Buffalo Fans we will be disappointed because they will take AJ Green or some crap lol and nothing against Green or Spiller from last year, but they aren't a need of this team...we need some one who can pass rush. I would suggest a QB too to sit behind Fitzpatrick for a year, but with the 3rd overall pick, I don't think it's worth it unless they trade down and get more later round picks

  33. #33
    crjohnson32
    crjohnson32's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-16-10
    Posts: 989
    Betpoints: 237

    Quote Originally Posted by LChruscial85 View Post
    seeing if they don't know how to draft I can't even make an educated guess....I'm hoping Von Miller, but knowing us Buffalo Fans we will be disappointed because they will take AJ Green or some crap lol and nothing against Green or Spiller from last year, but they aren't a need of this team...we need some one who can pass rush.
    I mostly agree although I would prefer a run stuffer at #3. I think the front office should just identify the weakest part of the team and draft someone who can address that ASAP. That could be either rush defense or pass rush, as long as they start by week 1. The only thing that would really piss me off is if they draft a QB at #3. No one in this years QB class is good enough to start and with all the holes in this team the last thing we need is someone holding a clip board on the sideline.

    Von Miller, JJ Watt, Marcel Dareus, Robert Quinn, maybe Patrick Peterson

  34. #34
    newguy
    [Too Long]
    newguy's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 12-27-09
    Posts: 6,100
    Betpoints: 9990

    I made a decision on Sunday night that I would bet either side of -150 - I thought the Canucks should be -150 - if they were less I was on them, over and I am on Hawks. Vancouver was what, -220 in game 5? Something like that. From a pure value standpoint - seems like Hawks are way to go. Both of Canuck's goalies are hurt. That being said - when you watch the games - which I have seen every minute of - you just can't understand why Vancouver isn't winning. Even in OT on Sunday - Canucks had something like 16 shots on goal - and yet Hawks win with a goal from a guy practically laying on the ice. It doesn't make sense - but I think getting +140 on a team that is clearly in the head of the goalkeepers - and playing with literally nothing to lose - hard to pass that up!!!

  35. #35
    crjohnson32
    crjohnson32's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-16-10
    Posts: 989
    Betpoints: 237

    Quote Originally Posted by newguy View Post
    I made a decision on Sunday night that I would bet either side of -150 - I thought the Canucks should be -150 - if they were less I was on them, over and I am on Hawks. Vancouver was what, -220 in game 5? Something like that. From a pure value standpoint - seems like Hawks are way to go. Both of Canuck's goalies are hurt. That being said - when you watch the games - which I have seen every minute of - you just can't understand why Vancouver isn't winning. Even in OT on Sunday - Canucks had something like 16 shots on goal - and yet Hawks win with a goal from a guy practically laying on the ice. It doesn't make sense - but I think getting +140 on a team that is clearly in the head of the goalkeepers - and playing with literally nothing to lose - hard to pass that up!!!
    regardless of which side of the line you bet, it's never an all in play, the OP can quote me on that even if Vancouver wins, since I'm on the Canucks too.

123 Last
Top