<br>
<br>
You must have your head in your arse. No other explanation.<br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Cloture_Voting,_Uni ted_States_Senate,_1947_to_2008.svg& page=1" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Cloture_Voting,_Uni ted_States_Senate,_1947_to_2008.svg& page=1</a><br>
Sorry if it's hard to read - but there are pictures! They are pretty, too!<br>
<br>
Lets go deeper, ms. facts<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/the-history-of-the-filibuster-in-one-graph/2012/05/15/gIQAVHf0RU_blog.html" target="_blank">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/the-history-of-the-filibuster-in-one-graph/2012/05/15/gIQAVHf0RU_blog.html</a><br>
<br>
Defend this.<br>
I must be f'n stupid, because I get information from more than one source Mrs Brilliant.<br>
No, I just read and read and read and figure it out on my own - that's why I've never had a losing year whilst handicapping and have finished higher than YOU ever will at BTP. It requires WORK, son. It requires more than a doob and no real argument, ala what you give: "you must be joking. No other explanation"<br>
You COULD be the smartest person alive with that type of response(if that's what we call it), as in, you give 0 argument, 0 facts, 0 links (which I hate giving, I'd rather a voter do the work on their own - and I spent all of 2 minutes finding mine).. And still have contributed 0 that was not already a 'talking point', from EITHER party.<br>
<br>
I don't mean to show you up. But if you're going to say such a thing with Z-E-R-O to back it up, then you can basically go f off. Thanks. If you're gonna talk shite on me, be prepared - at least I work at my opinions, madame.
<br>
You must have your head in your arse. No other explanation.<br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Cloture_Voting,_Uni ted_States_Senate,_1947_to_2008.svg& page=1" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Cloture_Voting,_Uni ted_States_Senate,_1947_to_2008.svg& page=1</a><br>
Sorry if it's hard to read - but there are pictures! They are pretty, too!<br>
<br>
Lets go deeper, ms. facts<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/the-history-of-the-filibuster-in-one-graph/2012/05/15/gIQAVHf0RU_blog.html" target="_blank">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/the-history-of-the-filibuster-in-one-graph/2012/05/15/gIQAVHf0RU_blog.html</a><br>
<br>
Defend this.<br>
I must be f'n stupid, because I get information from more than one source Mrs Brilliant.<br>
No, I just read and read and read and figure it out on my own - that's why I've never had a losing year whilst handicapping and have finished higher than YOU ever will at BTP. It requires WORK, son. It requires more than a doob and no real argument, ala what you give: "you must be joking. No other explanation"<br>
You COULD be the smartest person alive with that type of response(if that's what we call it), as in, you give 0 argument, 0 facts, 0 links (which I hate giving, I'd rather a voter do the work on their own - and I spent all of 2 minutes finding mine).. And still have contributed 0 that was not already a 'talking point', from EITHER party.<br>
<br>
I don't mean to show you up. But if you're going to say such a thing with Z-E-R-O to back it up, then you can basically go f off. Thanks. If you're gonna talk shite on me, be prepared - at least I work at my opinions, madame.