Originally posted on 10/18/2017:

Quote Originally Posted by The Kraken View Post
Money you have questions but you allow not having answers to drive to you to illogical conclusions. This is where people get into trouble, questions are fine but know that the answer may be simple. Why haven’t you seen video from the 32nd floor? Probably because mgm has came out and said they will not be releasing much more info to the public until the investigation is over, same as the fbi.

Nothing points to this being a job. Yes, questions need answered but that doesn’t satisfy your argument
nothing?

- ceo sells off most of his stock before the attack, never had any kind of major sales like that
- soros buys put options, never had action like that on any casino stock
- superman shooter magically shoots 200 rounds through a door that doesn't have any bullet holes in it, and barely hits one guy from 5 feet away but can hit over 500 people from 3 blocks away without a problem... all with only leaving 20 shells on the ground
- frieght elevator has a camera in it, and it is completely on the other side of his room, no reason to take it. easy escape route down the stairs next to room but again he has no interest in that in the hour he is left alone
- room service says paddock was seen in the room with other people, and heard with other people, fbi says he was pretending to have conversations lol
- woman warns people in the crowd that they are all gonna die
- every initial witness says there were multiple shooters
- witnesses/workers on the scene have their phones and tablets taken and scrubbed clean by fbi
- gag order on police and casino employees
- at least 6 other locations had reports of shootings, confirmed by employees in videos and on social media... those weren't all just someone dropping a fork and everyone panicking
- army trucks visible on witness video, on the scene right next to mandalay bay
- 28 year old witness that reported being chased by shooters on the ground mysteriously ends up dead the first time she's left alone

there is nothing illogical about assuming that people with means and motive might have committed a crime... rather than people with no motive... when witnesses with nothing to gain by lying have conflicting stories with people that have everything to gain by lying, i go with the witnesses