Originally posted on 08/05/2017:

I really dont agree at all with any forum having that as a final finding in support of a book (sponsor or not) towards a post up player risking funds, playing and winning a clear PROP. Why? Well this is part of it

They BOL are obvioulsy only making a PROP on something that can be seen and it viewed. they make these all the time.

For the superbowl or state of the Union speech they dont make a PROP that reads first thing the winning coach says to his wife at home. WHY? Well because they have no way of knowing so guess what THEY DONT MAKE THAT PROP. As in never... And they know not to make that Prop. Is SBR saying An A rated book does not understand bookmaking and PROP writing? Seems like a C- type book then right? Either for stiffing the player here or just not having a clue either way I suppose C- but I prefer keeping them at A and paying winning players after some honest respectful dialogue between players, forums and sportsbook. This can be fixed easily.




I Dont think they are stupid in fact I know they are not stupid they are top notch in lines and matchups and Props. I've seen them write hundreds, not hundreds, thousands, maybe Tens of thousands of Props over the years and they are clever, solid lines, unique stuff at times, keep the vig high like all props and seem to watch limits etc. They know what they are doing like they did here. In this case Did they have them up soft line based on their guess at the length of time the meeting might go on, or some special format they thought likely and set the lines off that, perhaps, but the Post up player thinking thought different and thought maybe some value here. Play away. thats the classic battle of Props .



they knew there was a meeting that would be covered, there was a meeting, and it would be covered, live video and audio was covered, Clip a pretty long one of the meeting, it was not a photo OP just smile for camera. (were some words said off camera before or after like a coach and wife after the Super bowl, of course nobody is saying they were not). But the political meeting happened and was taped and shown to the world had some discussions and banter and words (there were words) . The special words were not said, and grade it as it was.

I think this is a win for the player, many others also do. Im a bit surprised so little chatter on this here or on forums. When you think the pages of discussion and even months of discussion and opinions that Coreys Mom issue had on the forums... this one is like 3 guys kicking it around.

Well Really hope good dialog is continuing.