Originally <a href='http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/showthread.php?p=25571051'>posted</a> on 04/13/2016:

Quote Originally Posted by Auto Donk View Post
they should do like nascar, and invert the standings between segments -- ie, whoever had the best car and finished 1st in one segment, is put at the back of the field for the next, 2nd, next to last, so that the faster cars will have to work their way back through the field in the next segment....

as sbr programming generally relegates the finish of the final table directly converse to where you came into the final table (ie, if you were 9th, u generally get second; if you were 3rd, u generally get 8th, if you were 2nd, u wind up ninth), it would be fair to put the leader --WHOEVER THAT WAS, AS i HAVE NO IDEA-- in 13th, 2nd gets 12th, 3rd, gets 11th, 4th gets 10th, etc. etc.

low man with small stack gets 1st and the 600 pts that go with it, 12th gets second and the 375 pts, 11 th gets 3rd, and so on.....

that's how sbr's programmed bullshit would have turned out.... and if peavy was in it, he gets first b/c he's the golden boy; adjust the others directly inverse to their chip stack size..... RULING FINAL....
They update a excel spreadsheet once a day, so takes 3 minutes. Then they ignore anyone else here and even threads they make asking questions.

You want them to do a breakdown like this? Ha you're funny. They'd rather make stupid ass monkey videos.