Originally <a href='http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/showthread.php?p=24721857'>posted</a> on 10/28/2015:

Player put in a $4500 bet on an NFL side. There's no claim that this was a bad line. At that point, Tony could have reviewed the account and voided the wager if he thought there were something fraudulent. He didn't.

If he waited until after the event to void the winnings, the player was free-rolled. The only time the "industry standard" would allow that is if there were clear evidence of fraud. If, as the player states, the only evidence is that the player opened an account in LV on his friend's iPad, that's not enough (assuming we can verify he lives in LA, and placed the bet in LA).

Is this dispute really over an NFL Sides bet, and not some sort of NFL derivative? Limiting a player on the biggest US market is Mickey Mouse bookmaking. Voiding a winning wager on the biggest US Market after the event, under these circumstances, is scandalous without more.