Originally posted on 01/26/2015:

Quote Originally Posted by fitguy67 View Post
1. Ron...thanks for helping to sort out the range of bet-size descriptors.

And thanks also to FightFightFight for asking an inherently-interesting question (how to guage how a night went when bet-sizes are not explicily quantified)...unfortunately the question was worded in an inherently-snotty way that belied its sincerity (in logic, such a flawed question is called a "mu" quesion, such as "hey FightFightFight, when do you get out of prison for pedophilia?"...a question with an embedded faulty assumption)...anyhow, got me thinking about how to go about estimating a ball-park net-result under such circumstances.

2. These white-label MD post-alikes are not very long on reading comprehension, are they? After trying to appeal to their sense of logic/common decency, I've only resorted to "shrouding" a grand total of two of 'em so far (Queerin' and BavaNagila)...and have done so with a tongue-in-cheek "recommended ban" on direct 2nd-person interaction (only because it's a total waste of time trying to "reason" with adolescent smart asses). Anyone else gets the benefit of the doubt and direct interaction...even FFF with the snotty mu-question has not yet proved himself to be beyond redemption.

Poor blue-face can't grasp that there are no rules, just the underlying "tit for tat" principle at play here...disdain will be met with retaliatory disdain, not the deference that the "love to dish it out, but can't take it" pussies had come to expect until very recently.

Yes, there's a new order around here...driven by garden-variety civility...such as has been exhibited nicely over the last two event threads, which have been infinitely more enjoyable with the mean-spirited/ridiculing ones finally kept at bay.
Man, it's only a message board. You should probably put all of this energy into something else.