Originally posted on 01/28/2014:

SBR needs to give a more complete review of the evidence on both sides to explain the decision to the people who are outraged. To me, it looks very very suspicious that OP knowingly bet past post. He deposits on the same day of the bet and bets well past post. Then he goes into a chat and immediately has a guilty conscience from the start of the chat. His own version of events is nonsensical in that he says he bets fights at the last minute so he can judge the fighters appearance as he is coming to the ring but then he says he wasn't even watching this fight because he was at work. So why did he have to bet last minute (or well past post in this situation)? Has he even bet a boxing match before? He posted a ton of transactions and not one of them was a boxing match, let alone a fairly obscure one at a tiny casino.

I absolutely agree that 5Dimes has no right to confiscate his money even if he knowingly bet past post. Still, I understand the hostility if they think they have solid proof that he knowingly bet past post. I think it should be shared here since he is the one that brought this to the SBR forums.