Originally <a href='/showthread.php?p=16306424'>posted</a> on 10/08/2012:

Hi Ivy League Mirage, here is some math to suck on.

If you went 28-22 on spreads, the likelihood that you would actually be a (52%) losing gambler would be:

.52(50) = e(x) = 26 wins

(28-26)/((50*.52*.48)^.5) = .566

This .566 is the # of standard deviations your mighty 28 win total is from the (losing gambler) mean. That is nothing and proves nothing about your system.

Let me explain further. This .566 indicates that a 52% LOSING gambler would go 28-22 or BETTER 29% of the time when in a series of 50 bets. Are you fxcking kidding me pal? Going 28-22 proves nothing you chump. Nearly 1/3 of NFL seasons a losing gambler be able to brag as you have. Get some perspective