Originally posted on 10/04/2012:

I'm surprised to see so many of you act blindsided by a Romney rout in Debate 1.

Romney has the advantage of being non-specific and theoretical with his policy -- much like Obama four years ago.

Obama has to debate based on his track record, which isn't good. This had all the makings of a slaughter. But remember, it's dangerous to back a candidate based on what he'll say just to get elected, vs. what he'll actually do when elected. That's how we ended up with Obama in the first place. Yet that's also why, if we elect Romney, there are no guarantees. He can afford to be cryptic right now. Be careful.