Quote Originally Posted by hardball View Post

Do I really have to explain to you why the most respected economists use GDP per capita PPP vs Nominal??

I really thought you would be a challenge.....

And the data is from a 2010 est pal....Click the link.

You sir, are a LIAR or an IDIOT. Which is it?

Here's a source from a different link.The very source of your education. Again...just click the link.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...%29_per_capita

Enjoy.



More info on your disorder. I really don't like wiki... but it seems to be where you get your facts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narciss...ality_disorder
Hardball, your arrogance makes me think that you're the one with this disorder. Let's rip apart your post now.

I see a trend in your posting. You use these "do I really need to explain to you why economists..." lines which you consider gives you instant credibility. You said it earlier for the Gini Coefficient and now you're saying it with PPP vs. Nominal GDP. Let's hear your own explanation and spare me the "do I really need to explain to you" lines. Let's hear it.

Look at the link you posted. It has 2004 in the HTML. So how is the LIAR or IDIOT now? Your link doesn't even open. Your stats are from 2004 sir. You are the piece of shit liar. Look at the HTML. It ends with "2004rank.html" and it doesn't even open. You are so full of shit and you've been exposed.

As for you not liking Wiki, that's not my problem, it's yours. If you knew how Wiki works, all of the facts on it are sourced, it's one of the requirements of posting on Wiki. Each fact is reference to its source. It's more credible than sites that don't source their facts. If you're the academic type you try to make yourself out to be, why would you not like a source that references its facts?

Anyways, I'm waiting on your explain as to why the Gini Coefficient is so flawed and why PPP per capita is a better measure than GDP per capita.