Before taking sides, more should be known about the charge back history of this player. I personally feel that a player who does charge backs gives up his rights to fair settlements. Why would I care if a thief runs into another thief? This player is just as D- as the book. They deserve each other. If he already knew he would do a charge back if he lost, he could take far greater risks, so the 46K is a disproportional amount in winnings. The fact that he admitted to doing charge backs does not suddenly make him an honest player. And the fact that he won big at other casinos only underscores that point. This guy is a hit-or-miss type of player, who charges back after a miss. I don't really understand why such a crucial point is so easily overlooked here. It is at least as important as the cheating by the book. I also think it is completely fair for books to share info on which players have done charge backs. Such players should be blacklisted.