[bigboydan]

This should be interested after the way he stuck it straight up Miami's ass when he started that game for the Raiders.

[tblues2005]

This is an interesting game with the Vikings not having their running back is really going to hurt them, I would side with the Raiders here but I am going to stay away from this game though.

[Crutch]

Vikings no running back? U gotta go with Oakland on this one then

[Crutch]

i bet Culpepper will bring his best also

[onlooker]

Only thing I like in this match up is the OVER 35. I think they can scrap up 40 points total.

[bigboydan]

I'm liking the over as well Looker.

[idontlikerocks]

this is the first time since opening week that i have taken the raiders. i have seen minnesota play once and my impression is that they cannot stop a seasoned quarterback from picking them apart

[mgcolby]

this is the first time since opening week that i have taken the raiders. i have seen minnesota play once and my impression is that they cannot stop a seasoned quarterback from picking them apart

Culpepper is an idiot with a big gun. He can't read defenses and has done jack since he lost Moss. So, I wouldn't factor his passing accuracy or abilities into your play. The Raiders will most likely win the game, but that won't be a result of Culpepper's competency, it will be due to the Vikings offensive woes.

[AC1318]

chester taylor is still around

[bigdog3580]

Vikings no running back? U gotta go with Oakland on this one then

Chester Taylor is a more than capable back going against Oakland.
Lay the points.