1. #1
    qwertvt
    qwertvt's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-04-09
    Posts: 1,419
    Betpoints: 30

    Question about the targeting rule in US Football

    If you have a situation where targeting occurs by the defense, what happens if the offensive team declines the penalty?

    I can’t remember if the offending player is still ejected.

  2. #2
    RudyRuetigger
    Leave of absence until March Madness
    RudyRuetigger's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-24-10
    Posts: 64,799
    Betpoints: 55

    Isn't it a dead ball foul?

    If so, no reason to decline

  3. #3
    daneblazer
    Most Well Rounded POY
    daneblazer's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 09-14-08
    Posts: 27,837
    Betpoints: 5652

    Why would they decline it? It’s free yards.

    Targets are reviewed and refs decide if the kid is ejected

    one of the worst rules in sports because it’s subjective. Now the punishment is even more severe

  4. #4
    Eddy Munny
    Eddy Munny's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-13-13
    Posts: 14,581
    Betpoints: 24927

    Show me a coach who declines a personal foul penalty and I'll show you a future McDonald's applicant.

  5. #5
    clockwise1965
    clockwise1965's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-01-13
    Posts: 6,751
    Betpoints: 18366

    Its 2 separate calls. Unsportsmanlike conduct is a 15 yard penalty. Targeting is an automatic ejection.

    You can have unsportsmanlike conduct and targeting on the same play.

  6. #6
    Eddy Munny
    Eddy Munny's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-13-13
    Posts: 14,581
    Betpoints: 24927

    Quote Originally Posted by clockwise1965 View Post
    Its 2 separate calls. Unsportsmanlike conduct is a 15 yard penalty. Targeting is an automatic ejection.

    You can have unsportsmanlike conduct and targeting on the same play.
    Started drinking early huh?

  7. #7
    asiagambler
    asiagambler's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-23-17
    Posts: 6,372
    Betpoints: 30424

    I can see a situation where this could apply. There would have to be a turnover on the play and the targeting occurs after the turnover. There must also be a penalty before the turnover (by the defense). In that case, it's in the best interest of the offense to accept the first penalty to nullify the turnover and decline the targeting.

    I know in college, they automatically review all targeting plays though so player may still be ejected.

  8. #8
    BigdaddyQH
    BigdaddyQH
    BigdaddyQH's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-13-09
    Posts: 19,530
    Betpoints: 8638

    It will never happen. Targeting is an automatic 15 plus an ejection. There must be an ejection for a targeting penalty, or the penalty is NOT a targeting penalty. A team does not have the option of accepting or declining the penalty.

  9. #9
    RudyRuetigger
    Leave of absence until March Madness
    RudyRuetigger's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-24-10
    Posts: 64,799
    Betpoints: 55

    Quote Originally Posted by asiagambler View Post
    I can see a situation where this could apply. There would have to be a turnover on the play and the targeting occurs after the turnover. There must also be a penalty before the turnover (by the defense). In that case, it's in the best interest of the offense to accept the first penalty to nullify the turnover and decline the targeting.

    I know in college, they automatically review all targeting plays though so player may still be ejected.
    I SAID

    i think it is a DEAD BALL FOUL

  10. #10
    pavyracer
    MOLON LABE
    pavyracer's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-12-07
    Posts: 82,189
    Betpoints: 410

    Why decline? It's a free time out for the offense to plan next play until the refs review it.

Top