No
https://www.forensicmag.com/news/201...aking-murderer
Some other facts about the case that should have made this a slam dunk:
OJ denied ever owning Bruno Maglis "those ugly ass shoes" (The type of shoes that left the bloody footprint at the scene). The prosecution then entered over thirty photographs into evidence of OJ wearing Bruno Maglis
A few hours before the bronco chase OJ made a "suicide tape" in which he said this,
“Oh boy, I don’t know how I ended up here. Please remember me as ‘The Juice.’ Please remember me as a good guy. Don’t remember me as one of the negatives that might end up here. Please, please, please, please leave my kids at peace. I love everybody.”
Would a man whose childrens' mother had just been murdered (and he knew he didn't do it) make a tape like that and lie about owning a pair of shoes even if he thought he was being set up? Seems like the first thing you would be worried about are your kids and their mother just getting killed right outside the door where they were sleeping.
If you delve deep enough, something in every murder case isn't done by the book because people aren't perfect, but that doesn't call for a not guilty verdict. It's why we have the words "beyond a reasonable doubt" in there. With that jury though it could have been captured on video tape and still be iffy that he got convicted.