[lakerboy]

I don't need the points. This pussy ass pats team is weak. They ain't beating the Steelers without gronkowski.

[RudyRuetigger]

ok me too

[frostno98]

Agree. ATL vs Pittsburgh in the Superbowl. Not having Gronk is going to show next week, they got lucky beating a very average QB that was benched.

[Bostongambler]

?????!... They bring that field goal kicking offense to Gillette next Sunday and it's Pats by 21

[lakerboy]

?????!... They bring that field goal kicking offense to next Sunday and it's Oats by 22

The pats defense is nowhere the level of the chiefs. The Steelers will score at will.

[Bostongambler]

I vote Pats by 7-10 range

[rizespor]

The pats defense is nowhere the level of the chiefs. The Steelers will score at will.

Pats can stop the run though. If Ben plays like shit again pats win going away

[unde0087]

Laker, Steelers aren't much better. They out gained the Chiefs by a huge margin and Bell ran all over them yet needed a holding call on a 2 pt conversion to survive, to a team that has no offense. Now you want to go all in against the Pats, who have a good offense and near invincible at home with Tom Brady?

[KVB]

[Chi_archie]

Pats allowed the lowest amount of points this year, correct?

[Bostongambler]

Pats allowed the lowest amount of points this year, correct?

No one scored a passing TD beyond 20 yards.

[unde0087]

Tomlin vs Bill....................hmmm

[krk1030]

Will be the same thing we just saw, steelers move the ball but cant get TD's.

Except on the other side you have brady instead of alex smith.

[lakerboy]

Those stats are garbage.

This year

Ravens had the best d.
Then the giants had the best d.
Then the Texans had the best d.
Tonight the chiefs had the best d
The Seahawks had a great d

The Steelers will convert next week. It's a bad omen for the pats that the Steelers didn't score a TD tonight. That will not happen again next week. The pats are finally playing a good team .

[lakerboy]

Tomlin vs Bill....................hmmm

Tomlin has won 2 Superbowls vs 1 loss. .667 .

Bill is 4-2. Should be 0-6. .667.

Next?

[Bostongambler]

Will be the same thing we just saw, steelers move the ball but cant get TD's.

Except on the other side you have brady instead of alex smith.

Especially the last line

[Bostongambler]

Tomlin has won 2 Superbowls vs 1 loss. .667 .

Bill is 4-2. Should be 0-6. .667.

Next?

Should be 6-0 actually

[unde0087]

Those stats are garbage.

This year

Ravens had the best d.
Then the giants had the best d.
Then the Texans had the best d.
Tonight the chiefs had the best d
The Seahawks had a great d

The Steelers will convert next week. It's a bad omen for the pats that the Steelers didn't score a TD tonight. That will not happen again next week. The pats are finally playing a good team .

You could say the same for Pitt.

[dlowilly]

Not only will the Patriots abuse the Steelers but Tomlin won't be able to look Belichick in the eye shaking his hand in the middle of the field after the game

[Bostongambler]

Those stats are garbage.

This year

Ravens had the best d.
Then the giants had the best d.
Then the Texans had the best d.
Tonight the chiefs had the best d
The Seahawks had a great d

The Steelers will convert next week. It's a bad omen for the pats that the Steelers didn't score a TD tonight. That will not happen again next week. The pats are finally playing a good team .

We are stating facts and eyeball common sense and u are saying it's a bad omen. Ok, good luck with omens.

[unde0087]

At least the Pats won convincingly against a team that has no offense, what is Pitts excuse?

[lakerboy]

You could say the same for Pitt.

Then why did you take the chiefs?

[Harry N. Lloyd]

Pats allowed the lowest amount of points this year, correct?

Uh, yeah, and let's not forget they had big leads in most games and were vulnerable to 'garbage time' scores. Also they are 14-3 ATS, even having to lay up to 16 points in Playoff games. Trust Belichek, trust Brady, don't trust LakerBoy who already this week told you to go all in on Texans ML and Brooklyn ML, etc. Go with the winners, not the losers.

[lakerboy]

At least the Pats won convincingly against a team that has no offense, what is Pitts excuse?

Pit was a 2.5 point dog. NE was a 16 point fave. You smoking tonight?

[Bostongambler]

Uh, yeah, and let's not forget they had big leads in most games and were vulnerable to 'garbage time' scores. Also they are 14-3 ATS, even having to lay up to 16 points in Playoff games. Trust Belichek, trust Brady, don't trust LakerBoy who already this week told you to go all in on Texans ML and Brooklyn ML, etc. Go with the winners, not the losers.

Harry N Lloyd u just went and totally redeemed urself!

[unde0087]

Then why did you take the chiefs?

Because Pitt is who we thought they were and Chiefs let them off the hook

[lakerboy]

Because Pitt is who we thought they were and Chiefs let them off the hook

Oh well at least I watched the game.

[DrunkHorseplayer]

Patriots -6 over the Packers in the Super Bowl.

[frostno98]

Don't look too much in Pitt just kicking field goal. The Steelers knew they were going against a Game Manager offense, so they didn't came out aggressive with Antonio Brown. I think Pitt DB will have an easier time against the Pats white receivers.

[Chi_archie]

Because Pitt is who we thought they were and Chiefs let them off the hook

well I'd like to go ahead and crown them though

[RudyRuetigger]

lakerboy is fired up and I just learned to not fade when he is like this

[KVB]

Because Pitt is who we thought they were and Chiefs let them off the hook

[Harry N. Lloyd]

Fade the Pats at your own risk......!

[Bostongambler]

Team that has the better game and doesn't turnover the ball will win.

[lakerboy]

Good luck to all. We are all brothers here. I don't want to fight. I will not fade the Steelers when they haven't lost a game in over 2 months.