 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
Anyone on JAX today
Had them +6.
Lions up 23-19 in the 4th quarter. They have a 4th and 2. Stafford showing no intentions of snapping the ball (he even admitted as much after the game). They were ready to take the delay of game and punt.
Some dipshit from JAX jumps offsides anyway. How is that even possible?
First down, drive continues, kick a FG with 26 seconds left that wasn't even necessary, win by 7.
Originally Posted by No coincidences
Some dipshit from JAX jumps offsides anyway. How is that even possible?
sorry
just humans... we are fallible
one of the 3 worst teams in the league on the road...'nuff said
That led for the vast majority of the game and only lost because of two fluke touchdowns.
I'm a Lions fan. They were out-played all day long and had no business winning. None.
You just got a bad number.
+7 (push) was hanging for a few days at many shops.
Good luck.
bad things happen to bad teams, I just don't see value in betting a dog sh*t team on the road especially when you are getting under a touchdown on the spread...still a tough break though I get it...Lions are looking competitive this year, as a casual Vikes fan it will be cool to see them play on Thanksgiving and actually have the game mean something this time of year
I no that hurts ... but I got lucky there had ..roit city -6
Well I got the Jags +7 but it felt like losing because they had every opportunity to cover that number and didn't. The two non-offensive scores, the penalty to keep final Lions drive alive, and the fact that there was just enough time left where Det couldn't run the clock out, and facing a 4th down, basically had to kick the FG for the push.
Had them on a 10 point teaser +17 and ML bet.
I had a +6 (+100) locked in three days ago. Closed at +5.5 (-113).
Only +7's I saw were offered at -130 or more juice.
Last edited by No coincidences; 11-20-16 at 04:07 PM.
At -130 to -140 juice.
No thanks.
good shopping
Not if you're paying a heavy tax for it.
good shopping
The way this game played out, the +5.5 or +6 covers 999 times out of 1,000. If you watched it, you'd agree.
Bad beat
What in the world are you talking about?
+7 was available all week long... If you wanted it, it was there for the taking, and no, it wasn't heavily taxed... I bet it at -115 but you could've had -110 depending on when you bet it and at what book.
"All week long"? Where? What book are you talking about?
Blake "pick 6" Bortles
The interception return for the TD was a total fluke.
Bookmaker had it +7 -115
Blowdog at+7 -115
I didn't watch it just think it's funny how he keeps throwing them... Well maybe it'd be funnier if I didn't also have jax
Bookmaker.... It was +7 for a good while before dropping to +6.5. Anything less than that means you probably didn't bet it until this morning or later.
It definitely wasn't all week long. You had about 10-15 minutes to get the -110 at open, and it was +7 (-115) for a few hours on Monday. Wasn't available past Tuesday at +7 at better than -120 after that.
Regardless, it shouldn't have mattered. Again, the Lions had no business even winning this game.
Yeah, I agree Jags should have covered whatever number was available but I've come to expect this kind of weekly meltdown from them. I had them against the Texans last week, and they lost despite Osweiler throwing for next to nothing. Again it was a pick six and a punt return that set the Texans up with goal to go that ultimately got them the win and the cover. Jax is hot garbage.
Lul get on that touchdown or nothing baby
Reply With Quote
