1. #71
    Petey Wheatstraw
    Petey Wheatstraw's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-09-12
    Posts: 1,036

    It was a catch.

  2. #72
    boomer62
    boomer62's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-10-11
    Posts: 1,500
    Betpoints: 102

    Quote Originally Posted by petey wheatstraw View Post
    it was a catch.
    but it wasn't ....ha ha ha

  3. #73
    Petey Wheatstraw
    Petey Wheatstraw's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-09-12
    Posts: 1,036

    C
    o
    p
    l
    e
    t
    I
    o
    n

  4. #74
    pavyracer
    MOLON LABE
    pavyracer's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-12-07
    Posts: 82,188
    Betpoints: 292

    Guys this was a make up call for the Packers from when they lost to Seahawks on a disputed call a few years back. NFL wanted a rematch to settle the score.

  5. #75
    boomer62
    boomer62's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-10-11
    Posts: 1,500
    Betpoints: 102

    Quote Originally Posted by Petey Wheatstraw View Post
    C
    o
    p
    l
    e
    t
    I
    o
    n
    n
    o
    t
    !
    h
    a
    h
    a
    g
    o
    p
    a
    c
    k
    !

  6. #76
    meader99
    meader99's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-30-10
    Posts: 4,223
    Betpoints: 5231

    Quote Originally Posted by d2bets View Post
    There's plenty disputable. The question is whether the 3 steps and a stretch were part of the act of the catch or were after he had already made the catch. This act of the catch and when the act ends and a football move begins, is not defined anywhere. That's a fact. So it's open to interpretation. My interpretation is that he caught the ball and THEN took 3 steps and a stetch and that the stretch was separate from the act of the catch. You can say otherwise. But it's a legit debate and dispute. Period.
    Everything you say after he took three steps is irrelevant. He never took three steps with possession of the ball.

  7. #77
    Gonz312
    Keep It Simple Stupid
    Gonz312's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-22-11
    Posts: 1,467
    Betpoints: 8214

    Dude was bobbling it through these supposed first two steps everyone is referring to. Unless he is a harlam globetrotter there is no reason for the ball to ever be rolling up his forearm/bicep and be considered possession. The stretch on the other hand is made during solid possession, so whether you want to consider that a football move seperate to the act of falling down is the biggie.

  8. #78
    d2bets
    d2bets's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-10-05
    Posts: 39,773
    Betpoints: 21413

    Quote Originally Posted by meader99 View Post
    Everything you say after he took three steps is irrelevant. He never took three steps with possession of the ball.
    And again, we will need to agree to disagree on that. I saw him secure the catch and gain possession as the first foot hit the ground. He then took two additional steps, and most importantly, a stretch. I did not see the ball the move or come free until after the stretch.

  9. #79
    meader99
    meader99's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-30-10
    Posts: 4,223
    Betpoints: 5231

    Quote Originally Posted by d2bets View Post
    And again, we will need to agree to disagree on that. I saw him secure the catch and gain possession as the first foot hit the ground. He then took two additional steps, and most importantly, a stretch. I did not see the ball the move or come free until after the stretch.
    We can agree to disagree, but in no way shape or form did he secure and gain possession of the ball with his "first step." I will give him his "second step" as one step. His "third step" was his foot dragging the ground as he was falling. Because he was taking the catch to the ground, he had to maintain control throughout the process, which he clearly did not. We can all hate the rule, but they got the call right. Unlike the Dallas/Detroit game, you will not see any rebuttals from the league office.

  10. #80
    packerd_00
    packerd_00's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 05-22-13
    Posts: 17,603
    Betpoints: 3369

    Lets turn the page on this guys,Dallas couldn't stop Rodgers from killing the last three minutes off,make a stop their and they still had a great chance.

  11. #81
    You mad bro
    You mad bro's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-15-12
    Posts: 16,641
    Betpoints: -23

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghenghis Kahn View Post
    whether it was a catch or not, KARMA IS A FUKKING BITCH!!!

    not just in football but in life. remember that...
    Well I hope karma gets u one day for making fun of children who are mentally ill ...

    Stupid fat fukk
    Last edited by You mad bro; 01-19-15 at 12:44 PM.

  12. #82
    Petey Wheatstraw
    Petey Wheatstraw's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-09-12
    Posts: 1,036

    Karma, Packers CHOKE. Let's talk about that now. CHOKE.

  13. #83
    GIVEMETHEMONEY
    GIVEMETHEMONEY's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-13-12
    Posts: 8,428
    Betpoints: 4903

    Quote Originally Posted by Petey Wheatstraw View Post
    Karma, Packers CHOKE. Let's talk about that now. CHOKE.
    I agree Karma is a bitch. First 2 trips to the end zone and field goals!! lmfao

  14. #84
    Double Bogey
    Double Bogey's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-24-10
    Posts: 1,465
    Betpoints: 1472

    Quote Originally Posted by Petey Wheatstraw View Post
    Karma, Packers CHOKE. Let's talk about that now. CHOKE.
    You hold a grudge like a woman. Time to man up and move on fruity.

  15. #85
    Petey Wheatstraw
    Petey Wheatstraw's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-09-12
    Posts: 1,036

    Quote Originally Posted by Double Bogey View Post
    You hold a grudge like a woman. Time to man up and move on fruity.
    I apologize and I do.

    No excuse for what happened by the NFL. Cowboys worked hard and together to try and make it this year.

    Unforgivable!

  16. #86
    ZetaPsi808
    July 2011 Poster of the Month
    ZetaPsi808's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-18-08
    Posts: 12,119
    Betpoints: 1982

    Quote Originally Posted by opie1988 View Post
    Archie....I understand it's a rule. And no amount if arguing is gonna change things.

    But the fact that yankee jew prikk jerkoff Mike Perieira has an opinion on it doesn't mean a motherfukkin thing.

    He's a Cowboy hater.
    it doesnt matter if hes a cowboy hater or not. based on the rules it was not a catch. its very cut and dry here.

    dez tried to extend the ball across the goal line before he had full control of the ball. as a result of him trying to score, the let the ball touch the ground when he did not have it fully secured

    dez should have just secured the catch and went down on the 1 yard line. but no he had to be greedy and wanted to score the touchdown

  17. #87
    ZetaPsi808
    July 2011 Poster of the Month
    ZetaPsi808's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-18-08
    Posts: 12,119
    Betpoints: 1982

    Quote Originally Posted by meader99 View Post
    We can agree to disagree, but in no way shape or form did he secure and gain possession of the ball with his "first step." I will give him his "second step" as one step. His "third step" was his foot dragging the ground as he was falling. Because he was taking the catch to the ground, he had to maintain control throughout the process, which he clearly did not. We can all hate the rule, but they got the call right. Unlike the Dallas/Detroit game, you will not see any rebuttals from the league office.

  18. #88
    Petey Wheatstraw
    Petey Wheatstraw's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-09-12
    Posts: 1,036

    He had full control of the ball. Indisputable!

  19. #89
    ZetaPsi808
    July 2011 Poster of the Month
    ZetaPsi808's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-18-08
    Posts: 12,119
    Betpoints: 1982

    Quote Originally Posted by Petey Wheatstraw View Post
    He had full control of the ball. Indisputable!
    except he didnt tho

  20. #90
    Salmon Steak
    Salmon Steak's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-05-10
    Posts: 2,110
    Betpoints: 613

    The ball touched the goal line before he lost control. The play is over TD. Dallas wins the superbowl. Romo robbed again.

  21. #91
    Petey Wheatstraw
    Petey Wheatstraw's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-09-12
    Posts: 1,036

    Quote Originally Posted by Salmon Steak View Post
    The ball touched the goal line before he lost control. The play is over TD. Dallas wins the superbowl. Romo robbed again.
    Beating NE would have been tough, but the hunger probably says your right.

  22. #92
    ZetaPsi808
    July 2011 Poster of the Month
    ZetaPsi808's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-18-08
    Posts: 12,119
    Betpoints: 1982

    Quote Originally Posted by Salmon Steak View Post
    The ball touched the goal line before he lost control. The play is over TD. Dallas wins the superbowl. Romo robbed again.
    lol ok pal

  23. #93
    nyplayer33
    nyplayer33's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-27-06
    Posts: 8,305
    Betpoints: 106

    People are going crazy on this dez catch/no catch..the one with guy in end zone was tons worse. Rules are clear no catch.change rules then

  24. #94
    nyplayer33
    nyplayer33's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-27-06
    Posts: 8,305
    Betpoints: 106

    Dallas wins sb lol..maybe as sports has told you..sea might have played dallas and won by 34 as romo's center snapps ball into endzone...wait that happened in subpr bowl..

  25. #95
    nyplayer33
    nyplayer33's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-27-06
    Posts: 8,305
    Betpoints: 106

    dez doesn't play to win, he plays to be the star and win. Possibly as the catch/no catch shows..instead of securing the ball he had to be the superstar and now incomplete

  26. #96
    Petey Wheatstraw
    Petey Wheatstraw's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-09-12
    Posts: 1,036

    Dez is a high competitor.

First 123
Top