1. #36
    k13
    k13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-16-10
    Posts: 17,537
    Betpoints: 1836

    Not talking about this bet but why is tying up money that bad?
    You won't get interest, you'll lose it faster anyway flipping coins.

    I tie up some of them my money for futures every year and double account while the daily bets is just a small grind of profit.

    Mind you I always take under in any season props/totals because of injuries.

  2. #37
    slacker00
    slacker00's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-06-05
    Posts: 12,262
    Betpoints: 15653

    Quote Originally Posted by k13 View Post
    Not talking about this bet but why is tying up money that bad?
    You won't get interest, you'll lose it faster anyway flipping coins.

    I tie up some of them my money for futures every year and double account while the daily bets is just a small grind of profit.

    Mind you I always take under in any season props/totals because of injuries.
    If you are just flipping coins to place your bets, bankroll management doesn't really matter, do whatever.

  3. #38
    thetrinity
    penetrate me to tears
    thetrinity's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-25-11
    Posts: 22,430
    Betpoints: 5536

    whats the limit on this bet i dont see it anywhere, i only see to make the playoffs -400

  4. #39
    BigdaddyQH
    BigdaddyQH
    BigdaddyQH's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-13-09
    Posts: 19,530
    Betpoints: 8638

    Here is the real reason why you do not take make this bet. Over the past 9 years, the defending Super Bowl Champs have a record of 1-4 in the following years first playoff game. That means 4 times they did not even make the playoffs the following year. So once, in the past 9 seasons, the Super Bowl Champ has actually make the playoffs the following year and won a game. And you want to take +110 that Seattle does it? That is the very definition of a "sucker bet".

  5. #40
    I/O
    I/O's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-26-11
    Posts: 7,922

    The better move (depending on line) might be Frisco not winning, or even appearing, in their first playoff game

  6. #41
    slacker00
    slacker00's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-06-05
    Posts: 12,262
    Betpoints: 15653

    Quote Originally Posted by I/O View Post
    The better move (depending on line) might be Frisco not winning, or even appearing, in their first playoff game
    SF has proven they can win on the road in the playoffs. If they get in, they'll have a lot of guys back too.

  7. #42
    I/O
    I/O's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-26-11
    Posts: 7,922

    Quote Originally Posted by slacker00 View Post
    SF has proven they can win on the road in the playoffs. If they get in, they'll have a lot of guys back too.
    Read or heard something maybe someone else can do the leg work on. Something about teams that lost in the conference finals the year prior and their 1st playoff game the following year. Don't know if it was just NFC or AFC or both.

  8. #43
    Cuse0323
    Cuse0323's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-09-09
    Posts: 30,169
    Betpoints: 87

    Quote Originally Posted by BigdaddyQH View Post
    Here is the real reason why you do not take make this bet. Over the past 9 years, the defending Super Bowl Champs have a record of 1-4 in the following years first playoff game. That means 4 times they did not even make the playoffs the following year. So once, in the past 9 seasons, the Super Bowl Champ has actually make the playoffs the following year and won a game. And you want to take +110 that Seattle does it? That is the very definition of a "sucker bet".
    Mind blowing that people don't know this. Seattle isn't some juggernaut, they had their year and that's over with.

  9. #44
    slacker00
    slacker00's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-06-05
    Posts: 12,262
    Betpoints: 15653

    Quote Originally Posted by I/O View Post
    Read or heard something maybe someone else can do the leg work on. Something about teams that lost in the conference finals the year prior and their 1st playoff game the following year. Don't know if it was just NFC or AFC or both.
    I have no idea what you mean. SF has been solid year in and year out despite coming up just short of winning it all.

  10. #45
    jtoler
    jtoler's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-17-13
    Posts: 30,967
    Betpoints: 6337

    Nothing crazy about the odds, in fact its probably negative ev realistically. So what its Seattle, they still have to MAKE the playoffs first, anything can happen.

  11. #46
    vividjohn45
    vividjohn45's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-21-10
    Posts: 6,331
    Betpoints: 578

    Quote Originally Posted by rm18 View Post
    I think it was 1k
    See
    500 at 499/1 NL
    500 at 999/1 WS
    Naw i saw a picture of it in a vegas betting newspapers. Books were sweating that future. That was a pro pik. 10K future wager at 100-1. No juniour joker like me.

  12. #47
    vividjohn45
    vividjohn45's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-21-10
    Posts: 6,331
    Betpoints: 578

    Ill give the fact coach carroll is a bad ass coach who wins national or league division titles. Dudes on another level. Spanks the opposite team in the final. He beat ou by 50 points for the natioinal championship. It was embarrassing.

  13. #48
    vividjohn45
    vividjohn45's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-21-10
    Posts: 6,331
    Betpoints: 578

    Ou is ranked 4 in nation this season. Same coach stoops that coach caroll bent over his knee and spanked his ass on national tv. Same ou beat alabama in sugar bowl last year.

  14. #49
    vividjohn45
    vividjohn45's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-21-10
    Posts: 6,331
    Betpoints: 578

    I doubt stoops wants to face.carroll again.

  15. #50
    vividjohn45
    vividjohn45's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-21-10
    Posts: 6,331
    Betpoints: 578

    Its the.pricing that bothers me here. Cub paid 104 today. Ez. Umpire. Usher ? is now 13-6 to the over today. After marlins lost 8-6. His games avg like 10.6 runs. And total was. 8.

  16. #51
    bob6199
    bob6199's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-10-14
    Posts: 1,609
    Betpoints: 2477

    Quote Originally Posted by Cougsky17 View Post
    It's a dumb bet, as others have said, because it ties up your money and you never know what kind of injuries can occur over a 16 game season. Plus the odds are terrible. You're basically betting they win at least 11 games AND beat an unknown opponent at an undetermined location.

    Even the futures odds of SEA winning the NFC Championship at 3/1 is terrible odds.

    Philly and Indy are the only teams worth betting to win the NFC/AFC, both at 12/1.



  17. #52
    k13
    k13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-16-10
    Posts: 17,537
    Betpoints: 1836

    +100 now..

  18. #53
    pavyracer
    MOLON LABE
    pavyracer's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-12-07
    Posts: 82,189
    Betpoints: 410

    Give me one reason to tie my money for 6 months?

    why not have an open parlay of 7 -1000 ML's in college football instead?

  19. #54
    Big Bear
    Love your neighbor
    Big Bear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-11
    Posts: 43,253
    Betpoints: 14

    Tonight is a likely preview of the NFC championship game.

    its a shame this game had to be scheduled so early in the season, for some reason it just feels too early for a big time matchup like this.

First 12
Top