1. #1
    Trivial
    Trivial's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-22-09
    Posts: 1,328
    Betpoints: 3472

    Sick of the spread...

    This week, I'm going with totals only and seeing how that goes for me.

    Starting off light with 2 games, and seeing how that goes.

    Buffalo/Jags OVER 42 1/2
    Indy/Ravens OVER 44

    Anyone see anything glaring wrong about this? From my perspective these are gimmes - but I won't use the L word. I have lost too much thinking that way.

    Nothing is guaranteed.

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Lost Angel
    Lost Angel's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-15-09
    Posts: 856
    Betpoints: 40

    Ravens offense hasn't exactly been productive of late and their defense albeit minus Terrell Suggs is still competent, I'd be on the under here but I suck at totals, I'm an excellent fade. Buffalo also, they don't score very many points. I'm not seeing why you call these "gimmes".

    Buffalo/Jax line opened at 42.5 and is still there (pinnacle) despite 76% of bettors on the over. Matchbook is taxing the under at -113, seems like they would rather folks take the over.

  3. #3
    2daBank
    2daBank's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-26-09
    Posts: 88,966
    Betpoints: 90

    i hate overs in general....that being said i wouldnt bet und on either of these and did take jax/buf ov21 1st half..gl

  4. #4
    iceminers26
    iceminers26's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-13-08
    Posts: 15,600

    good luck trivial

  5. #5
    Trivial
    Trivial's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-22-09
    Posts: 1,328
    Betpoints: 3472

    Thanks ice.

    If Cle/Det can get 24 vs. 24 in one half, anything is possible.

    Look what happened to Buffalo in the 4th quarter vs. Ten last week (and I'm a Buffalo fan).

Top