[qb1789]

Why not parlay at the very least both NE/DEN ML. They're both gonna win there's no question about it. I think that one will cover and one will not but its too hard to come to a conclusion on that. Can anyone give me a reason not to parlay these two? Am also close to putting in ATL ML in there also. $________$

[NOboy]

here's a fact to make you want to throw in atl ml

over the past five seasons, the Seahawks have won once when faced with a 1 p.m. ET start. And don't discount this: By the time the game starts, they will have traveled more than 8,000 miles in little more than a week.

[qb1789]

Thanks for that lil peice of info. Makes me even more confident and I've been on fire NFL wise lately.

[innovation]

Your return parlaying just NE/Denver pays about 48 for every 100 wagered. You are better off taking a future on Denver to win the AFC at -115 and then you can hedge by taking who they play next week and the points or let it ride.
If you like NE better they are +150 but unless ravens win your hedging opportunity isn't profitable.

I personally think people are in for a shock as one of those 2 loses straight up.

As far as Atlanta goes Seahhawks have shorter odds to win the Super Bowl than Atlanta does.

[pologq]

i think the smarter value is a 7 point teaser on the broncos/pats

[slacker00]

i think the smarter value is a 7 point teaser on the broncos/pats

Why not do both?

The DEN/NE makes sense if you think the NFL is rigged and they want Manning-Brady Bowl XVI or whatever.