[tbird509]

this as easy as it gets,betting double digit home team under dogs,last year it was8-0 and this year 4/5 ...anybody that can prove me wrong,i encourage to try,as a matter of fact,its literally 60% since 2000. seriously guys look it up,its worth the research,now that i made you some money,send some points my way

[slacker00]

Too bad there aren't any this week and probably none the rest of this season.

[tbird509]

true,and this is only nfl...but get ready for next year

[a4u2fear]

Yes I can vouge, I have every line from 1985 until 2010.

From 2000 to 2010, there have been 56 double digit home dogs, with home doggies covering 30/56 contests, and 0 ties. So, in order for you to be correct, they must've done extremely well in 2011 and 2012.

[a4u2fear]

well, 30/56 until 2010, if you were right in saying 8-0 last year and 4-1 this year, thats 42/69=60.9%

[yisman]

It is winning over any period, really. Last 10 years, last five years, etc.

The trouble is that it's pretty rare for teams to be double digit road faves. How many times did it happen this season? 5? 6?

I did look to play them, though. I was KC vs. Denver and Jax vs. NE.

[yisman]

Too bad there aren't any this week and probably none the rest of this season.

there obviously won't be any in the playoffs (any team decent enough to win a division is not going to be a DD dog at home) so we're definitely finished with DD home dogs. It has to be a top 3 team at a bottom 3 team really. Denver@KC and NE@JAX were two examples of that.

[tbird509]

my numbers are from 2000 till present, its hard to get info from twenty years ago,but the nfl changed alot so to me its not that relevant now anyways,but either way,im just sharing something that is consistent a winner in a risky business...i cant take credit for this,i got my info from a true huslter,when this guy walked in the room,people took notice,and when he talked,people listened...ive been using this for 15yrs and when he told me about it,he said he was using it since the 70's...you see my avatar,take notice because only 1% will ever see that in person,now get ready save up and pound this $hit next year....when you see it happen with your own eyes,you'll remember this...peace

[terpkeg]

So your treading water until last two seasons. I would think you have a random up swing. Would be interested to hear any theory why last two years would be more realiable indicator of future results than previous ten. Wouldnt be too keen on blindly playing this one.

[tbird509]

treading water,not even close.what people fail to realize is you can make money hitting less than 50% of your bets,you just have to have your big money on the right side,if its not for you,no prob,but next year when situation comes up,take notice

[slacker00]

there obviously won't be any in the playoffs (any team decent enough to win a division is not going to be a DD dog at home) so we're definitely finished with DD home dogs. It has to be a top 3 team at a bottom 3 team really. Denver@KC and NE@JAX were two examples of that.

Yes, you're probably right. I had to peek back at last year's PIT @ DEN game, DEN were only 7 1/2 pts dogs. The previous year had NO @ SEA who were 9 1/2 pt dogs. I'm curious how far back I'd have to go to find a double digit home dog in the playoffs.