[dynamite140]

-13 with a sprinkle on the ML at -610?




Really no reason in the world for Pittsburgh not to win this game in a rout. I think the Steelers will be the AFC representative in the Super Bowl. Chiefs, meanwhile, are as dysfunctional as it gets. Almost as worst as looking at line movement 12 hours a day only to bet $10 on a game. They have some offensive weapons and their D can be halfway decent at times, but they're vastly underachieving and their QB situation is borderline embarrassing.



So does Pittsburgh win big, or does KC get a miracle cover? Or does the NFL rig the game throughout and never even let Pittsburgh be up more than 4 points with their phantom penalties to prevent the spread from being covered? Just saw at sportsbook.ag, the Steelers' ML at -600 is being bet more than the Chiefs +13. Most importantly, Pinny had the ML go up from -570 all the way to -610. If a 2 cent live move gives me attention, 40 cent live move on the moneyline sure makes me . Is it trying to suck Chief backers into getting a higher payback coupon with the thought the NFL refs will do whatever they can possible to not let Steelers cover and thus make them feel smart by taking the ugly side? More importantly, could this be a sign of increasing the ML just to punish faux squares by taking the Steelers on the Moneyline, let alone the spread?




If you take the Steelers, what is your reasoning other than just the idea of KC will get demolished? I mean if the ML went from -570 to -500 at pinny, surely that would scare you but when it goes up to -610, sure it does make you feel good but is it REALLY THAT GOOD?

[sneakerhead]

faux u dynamite!

[Romanov]

Vaginamite you penetrating stiff you owe me you penetrate