[battle4life]

would like 3 to 1 atleast

[ngates815]

no man 17 to 1.


Yea, that's weird odds isn't in battle4life?

[blackbeSSt]

careful of the last game. you might not see starters in there as much as normal with the playoffs coming up. im sure they don't care about the record as much as another SB

[raiders72001]

pinny

\ Will the Packers win 16 Regular Season games? 10:00 AM 7001 Yes +172 7002 No -195

[ferndog]

I saw it at Ceasars no -300 yes +220

[d2bets]

I saw it at Ceasars no -300 yes +220

Yes +220 is a great value if they still have it.

[TR88]

[UntilTheNDofTimE]

Yes +220 is a great value if they still have it.

usually with bets like this it makes more sense to take whatever you were going to bet and let it ride for 5 games on the ML.

[dlunc3]

I got it at +300 last week

[LeagueCapper]

Date placed:
Aug 30, 2011 12:15pSingle #221117814 (Placed by Web)

Football - NFL Team Props (Prop) Moneyline
NFA 2011/12 - Will any team go 16-0
All wagers have action
(6215) Yes +3000 Thu@5:30p
Competitor6216) NoRisk US$ 66.66 to win US$ 1999.80

Date placed:
Sep 04, 2011 9:30pSingle #221709200 (Placed by Web)

Football - NFL Team Props (Prop) Moneyline
NFA 2011/12 - Will any team go 16-0
All wagers have action
(6215) Yes +2500 Thu@5:30p
Competitor6216) NoRisk US$ 20.00 to win US$ 500.00

[milwaukee mike]

i think 5 dimes has yes +160 no -220

[milwaukee mike]

usually with bets like this it makes more sense to take whatever you were going to bet and let it ride for 5 games on the ML.

but you need to work out the numbers either way, and guess at what those moneylines will be, in order to make a rational decision

[cankid]

dropped way too much for any value

[d2bets]

usually with bets like this it makes more sense to take whatever you were going to bet and let it ride for 5 games on the ML.

Sure, at a good market number, but +220 is better than market.

I figured GB:
-270 @ NY
-600 vs. Oak
-650 @ KC
-400 vs. Chi
-450 vs. Det

That's +181. As long as they keep winning, I think they go for the perfect record. I really don't see any game where I figure them to lose, although odds are they'll trip up somewhere.

[ferndog]

I'm giving it a shot at yes +220

[neverstoppers23]

intertops had this prop last week i think. it was when would packers lose their first game, and at the time it was +230 to go 16-0. this was before the det. game.
oakland was 9/1 i was i had laid some action on it.

[bigsmitty]

"is there odds packers go undeafted"...Is that betting that the team will or won't lose their hearing this season?

[5teamparlay]

Raiders beat the Packers this week or I don't post here until opening day of MLB 2012...

[smoke a bowl]

Sure, at a good market number, but +220 is better than market.

I figured GB:
-270 @ NY
-600 vs. Oak
-650 @ KC
-400 vs. Chi
-450 vs. Det

That's +181. As long as they keep winning, I think they go for the perfect record. I really don't see any game where I figure them to lose, although odds are they'll trip up somewhere.

Those #s could drop significantly in the last couple of games once GB wraps up home field adv thru playoffs.

[yisman]

Raiders beat the Packers this week or I don't post here until opening day of MLB 2012...

Goodbye.

[shaunovery]

8/11 to go undefeated in reg season