[*Torches*]

Good luck but I am skipping this

[neverstoppers23]

Bradfords WR, sucked last week. Drop a ton of passes, and Bradford didnt handle the pressure well. The eagles front four got to Bradford a lot. I think the Giants front four will have the same success. I think the line is close to what it will finish. So I think if i do bet on this game, it will be on the live line, or on the money line before the game.
BOL to everyone.

[sneakerhead]

Live wouldn't be bad, if Giants score first, you can get a good live line.
It never works for me though cause the opposite happens everytime

[Speedy88]

The line seems a little off. I think it should be -6/+6. However, I don't feel comfortable taking the rams at +8. Because I think there is a decent chance they lost by a 10+ points. I think a lot of people are underestimating the Giants, and overestimating the Rams.

[Ice House]

Rams ML ????

[MoneySpeaks]

i've got giants ml to finish a 4 team parlay.

[BettingWizard]

lang is on rams, what about brock?

[Ice House]

squares are on the Giants tonight... public pounding the fukk out of the Giants

vegas will cash big tonight

[Speedy88]

squares are on the Giants tonight... public pounding the fukk out of the Giants

vegas will cash big tonight

I'm tired of hearing this "Squares/Sharps" talks. Weren't all the squares on the Patriots this week and last week? How did that work out.

People try to make sportsbetting sound like there is a wrong and right team to go with everytime. And if you don't take the right choice, you are a square.

[BettingWizard]

it is pretty square to take a fav after the line already moved 2-3 pts

[BigDan]

squares are on the Giants tonight... public pounding the fukk out of the Giants

vegas will cash big tonight

no offense but i am so damn sick of all the "square/sharp/public" talk around here, honestly i find the terms irrelevant in this day and age where everyone has so much information available. according to threads ive read the last several weeks i have been square as hell continually backing boise st and stanford but you know what? they keep cashing. Have you noticed the over hit rate in the nfl going back to last year? over is always a more popular side percentage wise so is it "square" to be betting overs when they are hitting at a insane rate?

ok im done ranting so lets say that "square/sharp/public" means anything (which i dont believe it does), last season MNF was a "squares" paradise....

bottom line is the "squarest" ppl i know are continually trying to be "sharp" and worrying about bs that has nothing to do with the actual game.

All that said im on the Rams, not because it "sharp", "square", or whatever. simply because i feel this to many points for a avg nyg team to be laying.

[BigDan]

I'm tired of hearing this "Squares/Sharps" talks. Weren't all the squares on the Patriots this week and last week? How did that work out.

People try to make sportsbetting sound like there is a wrong and right team to go with everytime. And if you don't take the right choice, you are a square.

beat me to it. guess i was ranting while you posted this.

[BigDan]

it is pretty square to take a fav after the line already moved 2-3 pts

now this something i can get on board with far as the "sharp/square" talk goes. If anything is square it is betting bad lines.

[Matt1144]

Teased Giants to -1/2 and over 36 1/2

[Ice House]

no offense but i am so damn sick of all the "square/sharp/public" talk around here, honestly i find the terms irrelevant in this day and age where everyone has so much information available. according to threads ive read the last several weeks i have been square as hell continually backing boise st and stanford but you know what? they keep cashing. Have you noticed the over hit rate in the nfl going back to last year? over is always a more popular side percentage wise so is it "square" to be betting overs when they are hitting at a insane rate?

ok im done ranting so lets say that "square/sharp/public" means anything (which i dont believe it does), last season MNF was a "squares" paradise....

bottom line is the "squarest" ppl i know are continually trying to be "sharp" and worrying about bs that has nothing to do with the actual game.

All that said im on the Rams, not because it "sharp", "square", or whatever. simply because i feel this to many points for a avg nyg team to be laying.

haha i know i was kidding... i know people go crazy when they here the square / sharp stuff.

[Thurgood]

Eagles fan here who had to endure the heartbreaking defeat last night. QB position is huge in the NFL. Eagles without Vick last week and the Rams keep it close. Their D is playing very well.

I'm sure St. Louis addresses the WR drops this week. Back when I played ball, dropping passes were like missing layups. If we missed an easy layup we were running suicides all through practice until we stopped missing them.

Line jumped to +8 at my book so this was an easy decision. BOL everyone!

[AdamL2424]

I'm with you on rams Paco

[silver39]

If Bradford and Nicks are good to go I may take over in this game, only play I like

[JR007]

I agree Commish, even off that loss last week still think the Rams are undervalued

[JimmyJet]

good luck Paco......

[anthonydiamondLC]

This without a doubt is the right side. The giants are extremely banged up defensively as well as having nicks hurt a little too makes them in no way logically a 7pt favorite. I actually think the rams win outright. Spagnola is also the old defensive coach for the giants when they won the super bowl and he will be more then prepared for anything coughlin throws at hiM tonight. Paco I love this play good luck.

[paco]

This without a doubt is the right side. The giants are extremely banged up defensively as well as having nicks hurt a little too makes them in no way logically a 7pt favorite. I actually think the rams win outright. Spagnola is also the old defensive coach for the giants when they won the super bowl and he will be more then prepared for anything coughlin throws at hiM tonight. Paco I love this play good luck.

1 of the main reasons for this play. Giants should not be laying a TD here with all the players they are missing. SJax will try to give it a go and even if he cant, Cadillac Williams will be motivated to show he still got game. Rams need to air it out and Bradford could do that on the Giants secondary. They said he will play with a special glove that doesnt bother his finger.

[anthonydiamondLC]

Paco I would let you co-author a book with me on how many reasons we can come up with to bet the rams tonight.

[GunShard]

The Giants played so badly against the Jets in the preseason night game.

[maseda17]

I am on the Rams as well but bought the 1/2 point to avoid a push so sitting at +7.5.

[Ice House]

Rams is the play

[SpeedPro]

That's alot of green! I'll go with you on this one!

[Thurgood]

I am on the Rams as well but bought the 1/2 point to avoid a push so sitting at +7.5.

What book? My book had it +8 with no need to buy points.

[bureK]

Rams it is

[paco]

I am on the Rams as well but bought the 1/2 point to avoid a push so sitting at +7.5.

Bodog is at 7.5 @-115

[maseda17]

What book? My book had it +8 with no need to buy points.

5dimes. Most books right now have this game at +7.

[castertroy08]

Rams have a good chance at winning this game never mind covering the spread.

[DrStale]

What book? My book had it +8 with no need to buy points.

Dont see any books that have it at 8 right now

[LolsMcwinsey]

Rams have a good chance at winning this game never mind covering the spread.

Sean Archer

[No coincidences]

If you can get it at +7.5, take it.

Good luck my man.