[aje]

Overall tournament record of #1 seeds: (328-94) 77.7%
vs. #1 (15-15) 50.0%
vs. #2 (27-22) 55.1%
vs. #3 (12-11) 52.2%
vs. #4 (32-16) 66.7%
vs. #5 (32-6) 84.2%
vs. #6 (10-5) 66.7%
vs. #7 (4-0) 100.0%
vs. #8 (43-13) 76.8%
vs. #9 (48-5) 90.6%
vs. #10 (4-0) 100.0%
vs. #11 (2-1) 66.7%
vs. #12 (13-0) 100.0%
vs. #13 (2-0) 100.0%
vs. #14 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #15 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #16 (84-0) 100.0%

[aje]

Overall tournament record of #2 seeds: (238-103) 69.8%
vs. #1 (22-27) 44.9%
vs. #2 (1-1) 50.0%
vs. #3 (28-17) 62.2%
vs. #4 (3-3) 50.0%
vs. #5 (1-3) 25.0%
vs. #6 (19-9) 67.9%
vs. #7 (49-17) 74.2%
vs. #8 (4-2) 66.7%
vs. #9 (1-0) 100.0%
vs. #10 (20-18) 52.6%
vs. #11 (9-1) 90.0%
vs. #12 (1-1) 50.0%
vs. #13 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #14 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #15 (80-4) 95.2%
vs. #16 (0-0) 0.0%

[aje]

Overall tournament record of #3 seeds: (172-105) 62.1%
vs. #1 (11-12) 47.8%
vs. #2 (17-28) 37.8%
vs. #3 (1-1) 50.0%
vs. #4 (4-1) 80.0%
vs. #5 (1-2) 33.3%
vs. #6 (32-34) 48.5%
vs. #7 (5-3) 62.5%
vs. #8 (1-0) 100.0%
vs. #9 (2-0) 100.0%
vs. #10 (7-3) 70.0%
vs. #11 (21-7) 75.0%
vs. #12 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #13 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #14 (70-14) 83.3%
vs. #15 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #16 (0-0) 0.0%

[aje]

Overall tournament record of #4 seeds: (146-106) 57.9%
vs. #1 (16-32) 33.3%
vs. #2 (3-3) 50.0%
vs. #3 (1-4) 20.0%
vs. #4 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #5 (36-29) 55.4%
vs. #6 (2-4) 33.3%
vs. #7 (1-1) 50.0%
vs. #8 (2-5) 28.6%
vs. #9 (2-1) 66.7%
vs. #10 (2-0) 100.0%
vs. #11 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #12 (15-9) 62.5%
vs. #13 (65-18) 78.3%
vs. #14 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #15 (1-0) 100.0%
vs. #16 (0-0) 0.0%

[aje]

Overall tournament record of #5 seeds: (128-108) 54.2%
vs. #1 (6-32) 15.8%
vs. #2 (3-1) 75.0%
vs. #3 (2-1) 66.7%
vs. #4 (29-36) 44.6%
vs. #5 (1-1) 50.0%
vs. #6 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #7 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #8 (1-3) 25.0%
vs. #9 (0-2) 0.0%
vs. #10 (1-0) 100.0%
vs. #11 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #12 (74-30) 71.2%
vs. #13 (11-2) 84.6%
vs. #14 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #15 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #16 (0-0) 0.0%

[aje]

Overall tournament record of #6 seeds: (145-106) 57.8%
vs. #1 (5-10) 33.3%
vs. #2 (9-19) 32.1%
vs. #3 (34-32) 51.5%
vs. #4 (4-2) 66.7%
vs. #5 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #6 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #7 (4-3) 57.1%
vs. #8 (1-3) 25.0%
vs. #9 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #10 (6-4) 60.0%
vs. #11 (73-31) 70.2%
vs. #12 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #13 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #14 (9-2) 81.8%
vs. #15 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #16 (0-0) 0.0%

[aje]

Overall tournament record of #7 seeds: (92-108) 46.0%
vs. #1 (0-4) 0.0%
vs. #2 (17-49) 25.8%
vs. #3 (3-5) 37.5%
vs. #4 (1-1) 50.0%
vs. #5 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #6 (3-4) 42.9%
vs. #7 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #8 (0-1) 0.0%
vs. #9 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #10 (66-41) 61.7%
vs. #11 (0-3) 0.0%
vs. #12 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #13 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #14 (1-0) 100.0%
vs. #15 (1-0) 100.0%
vs. #16 (0-0) 0.0%

[aje]

Overall tournament record of #8 seeds: (82-107) 43.4%
vs. #1 (13-43) 23.2%
vs. #2 (2-4) 33.3%
vs. #3 (0-1) 0.0%
vs. #4 (5-2) 71.4%
vs. #5 (3-1) 75.0%
vs. #6 (3-1) 75.0%
vs. #7 (1-0) 100.0%
vs. #8 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #9 (53-54) 49.5%
vs. #10 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #11 (1-0) 100.0%
vs. #12 (0-1) 0.0%
vs. #13 (1-0) 100.0%
vs. #14 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #15 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #16 (0-0) 0.0%

[aje]

Overall tournament record of #9 seeds: (63-107) 37.1%
vs. #1 (5-48) 9.4%
vs. #2 (0-1) 0.0%
vs. #3 (0-2) 0.0%
vs. #4 (1-2) 33.3%
vs. #5 (2-0) 100.0%
vs. #6 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #7 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #8 (54-54) 50.0%
vs. #9 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #10 (1-0) 100.0%
vs. #11 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #12 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #13 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #14 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #15 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #16 (0-0) 0.0%

[aje]

Overall tournament record of #10 seeds: (70-107) 39.5%
vs. #1 (0-4) 0.0%
vs. #2 (18-20) 47.4%
vs. #3 (3-7) 30.0%
vs. #4 (0-2) 0.0%
vs. #5 (0-1) 0.0%
vs. #6 (4-6) 40.0%
vs. #7 (41-66) 38.3%
vs. #8 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #9 (0-1) 0.0%
vs. #10 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #11 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #12 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #13 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #14 (1-0) 100.0%
vs. #15 (3-0) 100.0%
vs. #16 (0-0) 0.0%

[aje]

Overall tournament record of #11 seeds: (46-106) 30.3%
vs. #1 (1-2) 33.3%
vs. #2 (1-9) 10.0%
vs. #3 (7-21) 25.0%
vs. #4 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #5 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #6 (31-73) 29.8%
vs. #7 (3-0) 100.0%
vs. #8 (0-1) 0.0%
vs. #9 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #10 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #11 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #12 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #13 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #14 (3-0) 100.0%
vs. #15 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #16 (0-0) 0.0%

[aje]

Overall tournament record of #12 seeds: (44-104) 29.7%
vs. #1 (0-13) 0.0%
vs. #2 (1-1) 50.0%
vs. #3 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #4 (9-15) 37.5%
vs. #5 (29-74) 28.2%
vs. #6 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #7 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #8 (1-0) 100.0%
vs. #9 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #10 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #11 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #12 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #13 (4-1) 80.0%
vs. #14 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #15 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #16 (0-0) 0.0%

[aje]

Overall tournament record of #13 seeds: (21-83) 20.2%
vs. #1 (0-2) 0.0%
vs. #2 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #3 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #4 (18-65) 21.7%
vs. #5 (2-11) 15.4%
vs. #6 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #7 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #8 (0-1) 0.0%
vs. #9 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #10 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #11 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #12 (1-4) 20.0%
vs. #13 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #14 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #15 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #16 (0-0) 0.0%

[aje]

Overall tournament record of #14 seeds: (16-84) 16.0%
vs. #1 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #2 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #3 (14-70) 16.7%
vs. #4 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #5 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #6 (2-9) 18.2%
vs. #7 (0-1) 0.0%
vs. #8 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #9 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #10 (0-1) 0.0%
vs. #11 (0-3) 0.0%
vs. #12 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #13 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #14 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #15 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #16 (0-0) 0.0%

[aje]

Overall tournament record of #15 seeds: (4-85) 4.5%
vs. #1 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #2 (4-80) 4.8%
vs. #3 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #4 (0-1) 0.0%
vs. #5 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #6 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #7 (0-1) 0.0%
vs. #8 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #9 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #10 (0-3) 0.0%
vs. #11 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #12 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #13 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #14 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #15 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #16 (0-0) 0.0%

[aje]

Overall tournament record of #16 seeds: (0-84) 0.0%
vs. #1 (0-84) 0.0%
vs. #2 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #3 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #4 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #5 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #6 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #7 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #8 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #9 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #10 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #11 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #12 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #13 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #14 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #15 (0-0) 0.0%
vs. #16 (0-0) 0.0%

[imgv94]

Thank you aje!! Very Nice. You are the bomb!

[JayEgdarWho]

With 84 total 1v16s etc, this is data back to 1985? Right?

Many thanks.

[The Great One]

Wait a second. How could a 15 seed, be 0-1 against a 4 seed. That would require them to win 2 more games after they pulled the huge upset since a 4 seed is on the top half of the bracket. Do you know?

I hope it is not some 1948 tournament that should not be counted because it never happened.

[The Great One]

Thats kind of interesting for the 1 seed. It seems like a huge difference betweem them playing the 8 seed and the 9 seed in the second round especially considering both those teams are equally matched in the 1st round but the percentages clearly favor playing the 9 seed if you are the 1 seed.

Thanks for the info.

[BigD]

very nice post

[bigboydan]

thanks for the info bud. i for one do appreciate these types of posts.

[onlooker]

Nice stats aje. Thanks for posting, they can come in handy real soon.

[imgv94]

Interesting how 12th seed beats 4th seed 37.5% of time. Thats money..

[bigboydan]

it always seems like a 5 seed gets beaten by a 12th seed every year.

[imgv94]

12th seed wins 28% of the time vs 5th seed.That must show a profit.

[Winston Smith]

5 seeds win 28% of the time vs 12th. That must show a profit.

Other way around. 12th wins 28% of the time.

[imgv94]

Oh sheit. My bad.

[Alamorich]

great stuff

[Illusion]

It was either 2 or 3 years ago when 3 12's beat 5's and I nailed all of them. Dan should remember that. I won the entire contest that year soley on those upsets.

[Winston Smith]

Good stuff, this needs a bump.