Why are you going out of your way to pick a fight with me. Again.
It is now high noon Sunday, 3/28
Go reread what I posted on almost exactly three day ago on 3/25 at almost high noon Thursday.
Here is the link to this very same thread.
https://www.sportsbookreview.com/for...villinova.html
I'll summarize what I was thinking on Thursday, and I'll recap my thought process for you for you
In post #21 I responded to SBR poster Dark Star who thought Baylor would win by nine points, they did, good bet there as Baylor won the game by 11.
Baylor covered the number, not comfortably as the game closed between -7 and -8 depending on when you do your shopping but the bottom line in the bottom line and a win is a win. Good job Dark Side, good wager.
Now I responded by saying because I thought the game line at that time was pretty sharp three days ago and it was pretty sharp because Baylor covered by only three points (depending on whether you laid 8 points or not) pay attention now, this is the important part because you have a failed track record of the reading comprehension concept, i responded pretty much.....
"if one lines Baylor using Baylor in a money line parlay might be a better option"
I also said "if one likes 'Nova than another option would be to take them straight up on the money line for a very nice return on your wager"
(or pretty much to that effect)
I pretty much wrote, it was implied and any poster who has a clue about the term reading comprehension knows exactly what I was saying i said I am not betting the side, I thought the line was sharp (and it was) I thought Baylor would win but they could have easily won by 5 just as easily as they could have won by 11 (which they did) I had no strong feeling on the point spread betting line but I also said small lean (small lean means if you put a gun to my head and said "Nasher give me a answer of you will die") I would say maybe take the points.
if I have to define the term "small lean" to you at this point in tine than you need to find a new hobby.
Nowhere did I ever say Baylor was shit, I am on record all year as saying they are the best team or the second best team in the country.
Nowhere did I ever say Baylor was small, they are not small, I know the difference between big and small.
My only beef with you this time, I say this time because you are on record as saying stupid things on a regular basis is you said Illinois is not big. Their roster is very big. Then you said a starting point guard that averages about 22 minutes a game is not a part of the rotation, and that's when I said to you "how stupid can you be"
If one is a starter, and plays the majority of the game, how can you say he's not part of the rotation.
The starting lineup begins and ends with the rotation for the love of God.
Clearly I had no issue with your Baylor bet, I had major issues with the other stupid things you said along the way.
For the last time (I have said this to you 1000 times before in my attempts to try and help you out, back in the day when I was being cordial with you but now you just make it impossible for me) Before you post anything think about what you are saying, offer just a tiny bit of reasoning or input as to why you are making a bet, and don't cherry pick facts to make an argument after the fact) You claim to be lawyer in real life, you don't act like one. And never have I said I am flawless and error free. I make silly mistakes too, but when I do I apologize, thank those who brought it to my attention, and have some laughs too as I will poke fun at myself faster than anyone can. Humans are not flawless, humans are not perfect, not even a perfect asshole.
Just remember that age old adage that goes like this "Liars figure, but figures never lie"
There's a message in that adage I just posted there, can you tell me what that message is?
Now I have no more disposable time to talk to you today as I have to tend to my personal and family business at home, I have to also tend to my professional business and I need the rest of the afternoon to finish all that before the start of the business week tomorrow at 9 am.
Not for nothing, but you brought it up as I have no track record of bumping up any and all of my successful plays and I was not going to start this time but as I mentioned since you brought it up I handicapped that Baylor game to perfection as I am on record a couple of times as saying "I don't like the side I am staying away from betting the side because I think the line is too sharp" and it was if a basketball team covers an 8 point spread by 3 points that is what I call a pretty sharp line.
And here's the important part. I said.
"I do love the total, I said usually I stay away from betting 'unders' in basketball but I said I will make an exception in this game because I thought the game total was way to high, both first half totals and game totals.
I stayed away from betting the side like I said I would, and I bet the 1H and the game totals also like I said I would.
The game total covered by 28 points, pretty good bet, huh?
I don't like to brag, and I don't like to boast and I don't like to bump up my own posts but I will make an exception this one time. I offered my opinion, I backed up my opinions with reasoning an analysis because that is what I do for a living professionally, I am an analyst This is what I call handicapping a game to perfection.
Now Mr. Clock on the Wall says I have no more disposable time left this afternoon, hopefully I can catch the late games later so you can have the last word, I don't need to tell you that because you because you always have this unhealthy need to have the last word.
I'm out!