Had UNC at -4.5. Even brought a point down -3.5 to be safe and they still don't cover. I swear you can't make this stuff up. The missed free throws in the 2nd half was unreal.
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
04-02-17 01:07 AM #1
-
04-02-17 08:09 AM #2
seemed planned by both teams that UNC win by at least 1, but no more then 2 points. That level of bad play in the end by both teams was a shame. Don't believe in fixes altogether but something looked shady.
-
04-02-17 11:59 AM #3
Shady is UNC's nature, 30 plus years of fake classes for basketball and football players! Wonder when the NCAA will drop the hammer
-
04-02-17 01:48 PM #4
You should have bet the money line. They won that's all they care about
-
04-02-17 03:28 PM #5
How has that probe dragged on 3 plus years? Seems like they are waiting for UNC to have a bad run, which won't happen.
Originally Posted by StatePenn
Shady is UNC's nature, 30 plus years of fake classes for basketball and football players! Wonder when the NCAA will drop the hammer
-
04-02-17 03:45 PM #6
I wonder how we would have done in the March Madness if we had played the ML on every favorite of 7 points or less and taken the dog + points in the same games. It seems like there were enough small-medium favorites that won and didn't cover that would have made it profitable this year.
Reply With Quote