[mcvegas]

I lived in vegas for a year and gave out games to people by phone. I also played myself and yes lost more then I won. They say success is a bad teacher. So I discovered a system to play a home dog of between1 and 7 coming off a road win as a dog . If they are facing a team who lot a t home it goes up more. I would say this is a 75 percent winner. Examples Northern Illinois yesterday and Texas Saturday. Tonight it is Indiana state. Please check record since sat 2 and 0 now.

[emceeaye]

The Pacific game today meets this criteria...However, in your other post your criteria are different, and the Pacific game.does not meet those criteria. Is Pacific still a viable play based on this system?
Thanks in advance.

[emceeaye]

Rutgers +7 meets criteria for this system. BTW, Pacific won yesterday.

[emceeaye]

Brown +3 meets criteria for this system as well.

[tonywayne]

Brown +3 meets criteria for this system as well.

Brown won their last game (and it was on the road), but they were only a 1.5-point underdog. The system, as I understand it, requires a team being at least a 4-point underdog in the road win. That would make Brown no play today.

[emceeaye]

Brown won their last game (and it was on the road), but they were only a 1.5-point underdog. The system, as I understand it, requires a team being at least a 4-point underdog in the road win. That would make Brown no play today.

Actually, based on the system posted at the top of this thread, which says bet any home dog of 1-7 pts coming off a road win, Brown is a play.

However, based on mcvegas' system posted in another threao which says bet on any home dog of 1-6 pts coming off a road win as a dog of 4 or more points, Brown is not a play.

Either he intends both systems to be as written or one (or both) is a mistake--unclear.

[tonywayne]

Did you PM him to ask? I didn't want to do that if you already had...

[emceeaye]

[QUOTE=tonywayne;21156302]Did you PM him to ask? I didn't want to do that if you already had.mbers QUOTE]

I tried PMing him but my privileges on here won't allow me to send it to anyone but staff members. Perhaps you'd have better luck.

[tonywayne]

I sent him a message. I'll let you know when I get a reply (or maybe he'll just come here and reply direct).

[jsund]

correct me if i'm wrong ; is not the RUTGERS game postponed?

[tonywayne]

correct me if i'm wrong ; is not the RUTGERS game postponed?

That must be a very new update. It's still up on my sportsbook boards, and I'm only seeing it changed on Yahoo Sports to ppd.

[tonywayne]

I came up with 3 (or 4) plays on this system yesterday (Sat Feb 15). Results:

Virginia Tech +3 :: WIN
George Mason +2.5 :: Loss
Santa Clara +1.5 :: Loss

I also played Troy +10, even though it was outside the 1-7 point range. They were a winner.

So, 1-2 on the "system". 2-2 if you "played ANY home dog coming off ANY road ATS win".


Today's (Sun Feb 16) plays:

Siena +3
NC Greensboro +2.5

[emceeaye]

Tony, did mcvegas reply to clarify?

[SSSuperSergSSS]

dont suppose your bookie excludes OT tony? i tailed on both the siena and ncg games and they landed so many thanx

[emceeaye]

Today, Georgia Southern meets the more strict criteria for McVegas' system:

Play on any home dog of between 1 and 6 points coming off a road win as a dog of 4 or more points.