[No coincidences]

Providence -1.5 vs. Xavier.

Also leaning Northwestern, Miami, Texas and La Salle to start the day.

[Louisvillekid1]

What a joke that line is,

Has nobody been seeing the development under ed cooley?

2x wager for me

[PittsburghPlayer]

Hope you hit all of `em! Like Mia.

[mikmik]

Yup Miami looks like a trap for every sucker seeing Cuse only - 6. How about a ml play on the U? I think it has some vakue

[mikmik]

Why Texas?

[PittsburghPlayer]

Cold as fukk here in the mntns of NY.
`Cuse players distracted by warm weather and clit ies!

[No coincidences]

What a joke that line is,

Has nobody been seeing the development under ed cooley?

2x wager for me

Exactly. And X has talent, but they're all over the map. Plus they've covered in like 40 straight games.

[RavensFan2k3]

Yup Miami looks like a trap for every sucker seeing Cuse only - 6. How about a ml play on the U? I think it has some vakue

Definitely...i may attend this game to be there when we win and rush the court lmao...I was there when we beat Michigan State and Duke

[Louisvillekid1]

Lean Delaware as well

[mikmik]

Like Butler and Oklahoma state as well

[hustlehard617]

Anyone like Texas Texh tomorrow ?

[nvrlose37]

Providence -1.5 vs. Xavier.

Also leaning Northwestern, Miami, Texas and La Salle to start the day.

I like NW 1st half, Iowa FT.

[No coincidences]

I can't believe Michigan State is -5.5 vs. Michigan without Payne and Dawson. Wow.

[2daBank]

Lean Delaware as well

i played them, prob shoulda waited...

we gonna just make this the discussion thread NC? just getting started on card..

[nvrlose37]

I can't believe Michigan State is -5.5 vs. Michigan without Payne and Dawson. Wow.

so all over Wolverines?

[2daBank]

la salle catching points at home is little crazy i think,, they a vet group who values the rock, they went to vcu last year and made them play at their tempo, personally i dont think this vcu team as good, la salle isnt yet but there no reason they cant be and were playing good ball before slipping up in last gm.. bottom line is vcu isnt shit in the halfcourt and la salle gonna make them play a halfcourt gm when they not taking easy runouts off some ill advised vcu jumpers.. i feel like the wrong team favored but in fairness GW is the only impressive home win la salle has... im sure if i bet la salle now at +3.5 it will close at +5 or some shit but playing them anyway

[Ralphie1412]

I dont see how you dont take Michigan here.

[2daBank]

I dont see how you dont take Michigan here.

i take no credit for this as it was posted by "nrop" at another site, really respect his opinion and this was only thing ive read that actually gave me pause as far as taking mich...

As for the Michigan/MSU game, think it has the potential to be a good game. The injury to Dawson really limits a bit of what they want to do on the defensive end in terms of matchups, but think he is replaceable offensively. I guess the big issue I have here is the interior defense of Michigan. They can score with pretty much anyone as evidenced by their hot start here, but I have major concerns when they're forced into a physical type of game. MSU's going to pound, pound, pound and Horford's going to be in a tough position down low. Any ounce of foul trouble for him and it's hard to like Michigan's chances. Think you'll see MSU around a 6 point favorite. Izzo's never had a team that's 17-1 and a team that's started 7-0 in Big Ten play if what I heard is correct. Team's the real deal. Obviously doesn't mean much without Payne/Dawson. And I do think you see plenty of the Michigan 1-3-1, extending those MSU shooters out beyond where they're comfortable. Can probably argue either side, should be a good game.

[No coincidences]

I dont see how you dont take Michigan here.

Hard not to, especially given MSU's home struggles.

I don't know, though.

[No coincidences]

i take no credit for this as it was posted by "nrop" at another site, really respect his opinion and this was only thing ive read that actually gave me pause as far as taking mich...

As for the Michigan/MSU game, think it has the potential to be a good game. The injury to Dawson really limits a bit of what they want to do on the defensive end in terms of matchups, but think he is replaceable offensively. I guess the big issue I have here is the interior defense of Michigan. They can score with pretty much anyone as evidenced by their hot start here, but I have major concerns when they're forced into a physical type of game. MSU's going to pound, pound, pound and Horford's going to be in a tough position down low. Any ounce of foul trouble for him and it's hard to like Michigan's chances. Think you'll see MSU around a 6 point favorite. Izzo's never had a team that's 17-1 and a team that's started 7-0 in Big Ten play if what I heard is correct. Team's the real deal. Obviously doesn't mean much without Payne/Dawson. And I do think you see plenty of the Michigan 1-3-1, extending those MSU shooters out beyond where they're comfortable. Can probably argue either side, should be a good game.

"Pound, pound, pound" with who? Payne is out, leaving Costello, Schilling and Gauna on the low blocks with no Dawson to relieve the pressure.

[2daBank]

"Pound, pound, pound" with who? Payne is out, leaving Costello, Schilling and Gauna on the low blocks with no Dawson to relieve the pressure.

hell if i know, i thought 6'8/6'9 bangers grew on trees in sparty land? all i know is he was pretty spot on with the number which seems high to everyone else.. nrop knows the teams on a personal level far more than me, i dont really watch a ton anymore..

[No coincidences]

hell if i know, i thought 6'8/6'9 bangers grew on trees in sparty land? all i know is he was pretty spot on with the number which seems high to everyone else.. nrop knows the teams on a personal level far more than me, i dont really watch a ton anymore..

Not this year they don't. Already a sub-par MSU rebounding team, now they're really hurting on the low blocks and the boards. Of course, U-M is weak underneath as well.

This Stauskas kid for Michigan is the real deal. Could be argued he's in the national POTY discussion right now.

[2daBank]

Not this year they don't. Already a sub-par MSU rebounding team, now they're really hurting on the low blocks and the boards. Of course, U-M is weak underneath as well.

This Stauskas kid for Michigan is the real deal. Could be argued he's in the national POTY discussion right now.

yea he a bad ass.. just feels like they begging for mich money and that was only thing i read anywhere that wanst someone wanting to play mich so thought id post it...gotta figure line gonna move mich way if you like them and not like i can blame you, think it just a pass for me..

[No coincidences]

yea he a bad ass.. just feels like they begging for mich money and that was only thing i read anywhere that wanst someone wanting to play mich so thought id post it...gotta figure line gonna move mich way if you like them and not like i can blame you, think it just a pass for me..

It's probably a pretty sharp line. Big national TV game, GameDay is there, etc. I'm sure you'd be sweating it out either way.

[swag1982]

Any sec guys around any thoughts on the Florida game

[2daBank]

Any sec guys around any thoughts on the Florida game

talked bout some in the sat discussion thread... personally think 9.5 is too many in this gm.. feel free to add any thoughts to the other thread tho..

[swag1982]

Sorry if I'm beating a dead horse thx for our time

[BiffTFinancial]

Providence -1.5 vs. Xavier.

Also leaning Northwestern, Miami, Texas and La Salle to start the day.

Like Providence but like under better, esp 1H under. Providence will want to slow the pace, and XU gets a lot of points at the FT line. I think 1H could be a real snail. BOL today, NC.

[BiffTFinancial]

i take no credit for this as it was posted by "nrop" at another site, really respect his opinion and this was only thing ive read that actually gave me pause as far as taking mich...

As for the Michigan/MSU game, think it has the potential to be a good game. The injury to Dawson really limits a bit of what they want to do on the defensive end in terms of matchups, but think he is replaceable offensively. I guess the big issue I have here is the interior defense of Michigan. They can score with pretty much anyone as evidenced by their hot start here, but I have major concerns when they're forced into a physical type of game. MSU's going to pound, pound, pound and Horford's going to be in a tough position down low. Any ounce of foul trouble for him and it's hard to like Michigan's chances. Think you'll see MSU around a 6 point favorite. Izzo's never had a team that's 17-1 and a team that's started 7-0 in Big Ten play if what I heard is correct. Team's the real deal. Obviously doesn't mean much without Payne/Dawson. And I do think you see plenty of the Michigan 1-3-1, extending those MSU shooters out beyond where they're comfortable. Can probably argue either side, should be a good game.

i like nropp, have followed him on Twitter for a long time, but i think he's off here. UM or nothing in this game.

[BiffTFinancial]

I dont see how you dont take Michigan here.

Agree. Man's gotta have a code.

[2daBank]

i like nropp, have followed him on Twitter for a long time, but i think he's off here. UM or nothing in this game.

i dont necessarily agree or disagree.. seems like a sparty line but not like that means a whole lot, it wouldnt surprise me either way..wasnt hard to talk me off one side or the other cause saw a lot of other stuff i liked..

[Koldazzice]

Man I hate to say but I'm on the other side here. We are moving Xav + ML

[PorkChop]

No talk on George Washington - 4 @ G'Mason?

[GT21Megatron]

No talk on George Washington - 4 @ G'Mason?

On George. Mason +5

[ThaTopMoron]

Duke -1.5
Providence +6
Iowa -2