1. #1
    t-wizzle
    t-wizzle's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-18-09
    Posts: 38,099
    Betpoints: 2191

    Why did Washington open only -2 over Colorado?

    Makes no sense to me. Huskies aren't quite as good as past years but I still would have to say they are the more talented team here in this matchup.

    Both teams are at 11-5. Washington has looked solid of late while Colorado has struggled since getting robbed at Zona. I would have thought Washington would have opened closer to what they are now at -5. Seems to me that books like Colorado here.

    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    t-wizzle
    t-wizzle's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-18-09
    Posts: 38,099
    Betpoints: 2191

    bump

  3. #3
    JT OZ
    JT OZ's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-16-10
    Posts: 2,076
    Betpoints: 87

    Wondered the same thing but its obvious we aren't the only ones who feel this way.

  4. #4
    tto827
    tto827's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-01-12
    Posts: 9,078
    Betpoints: 76

    I'm just glad I got it at -2. I think 5 or whatever it got to seems like too much. 3.5 or so seems about right. Colorado is better than other years, and Washington is worse.

  5. #5
    JT OZ
    JT OZ's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-16-10
    Posts: 2,076
    Betpoints: 87

    Quote Originally Posted by tto827 View Post
    I'm just glad I got it at -2. I think 5 or whatever it got to seems like too much. 3.5 or so seems about right. Colorado is better than other years, and Washington is worse.
    Colorado has played a lot of close games so to get that number is a big deal considering this one probably stays fairly tight throughout.

  6. #6
    Capybara
    Punta Cana, bitches!
    Capybara's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-17-08
    Posts: 11,803
    Betpoints: 6238

    What I want to know is why the OU closed at 139? Sure looks like a slugfest. Waiting for the 2h under to pound.

  7. #7
    tto827
    tto827's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-01-12
    Posts: 9,078
    Betpoints: 76

    Quote Originally Posted by Capybara View Post
    What I want to know is why the OU closed at 139? Sure looks like a slugfest. Waiting for the 2h under to pound.
    Did you get a 2nd half total? If so what was it? Be careful, both teams shot god awful, if its under 65-70 I wouldn't touch it.

  8. #8
    JOHNNY DOBBS
    JOHNNY DOBBS's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-04-12
    Posts: 342
    Betpoints: 10

    Quote Originally Posted by tto827 View Post
    Did you get a 2nd half total? If so what was it? Be careful, both teams shot god awful, if its under 65-70 I wouldn't touch it.
    it was 72.5, and you were right.

    man unders are tough. Looked way under until the fouls and quick meaningless scoring happened at the end, that always destroys an easy under. covered by 2.5 only

  9. #9
    tto827
    tto827's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-01-12
    Posts: 9,078
    Betpoints: 76

    I rarely if ever bet O/U for that reason. Too frustrating, and I hit about 30% of them.

  10. #10
    Capybara
    Punta Cana, bitches!
    Capybara's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-17-08
    Posts: 11,803
    Betpoints: 6238

    Quote Originally Posted by tto827 View Post
    Did you get a 2nd half total? If so what was it? Be careful, both teams shot god awful, if its under 65-70 I wouldn't touch it.
    I did play this, at 72, and it got scary close at the end but did still hit and never looked in doubt til the very very end. Made back some of what I lost thinking Colorado would wake from their Arizona hangover. Man, what a shame about them, they vanished.

  11. #11
    No coincidences
    Baseball at The Corner
    No coincidences's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-18-10
    Posts: 76,300
    Betpoints: 16541

    I'm sure that's what KenPom's projection was.

Top