Seems like ppl post picks and they not even close to winning.. and they get the entire board on that pick it seems. who here works for the books.? I bet nobody will post and tell me.
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
02-29-12 12:28 PM #1
do you work for the books?
-
02-29-12 12:53 PM #2
-
02-29-12 01:19 PM #3
ive been thinking this for a long time now. Although I do respect many of the poster opinions for the most part people on here pick way too many losers its rediculous.
-
02-29-12 01:20 PM #4
It's so rediculous. All I'm trying to do is make a little green.
-
02-29-12 01:24 PM #5
I've learned just read through the threads and eventually you come to your own conclusion. Also when you see things like " Lock of the year, GOW, GOY, or some crazy money amount" just go the other way and you will be fine.
-
02-29-12 01:25 PM #6
Let's see you pick winners better than the losers do if it's that easy??
-
02-29-12 01:25 PM #7
I don't get what difference that makes? If someone I don't know posts a pick it doesn't mean I'll jump onmitmfor no reason! I suppose books may send some minimum wage person in these forums to post but they don't know most of the time who will cover anyway
-
02-29-12 01:25 PM #8
Like the first post today about Ohio for 4500$, Kent all the way. Truth is there just gotta read it properly.
-
02-29-12 01:27 PM #9
If you want a winner take the Spurs tonight.
-
02-29-12 01:34 PM #10
I bet the OP works for the books.
-
02-29-12 01:35 PM #11
Originally Posted by southpaw74
you are naive if you think the books dont know who will cover.
-
02-29-12 01:40 PM #12
Certain circumstances i suppose but not typically. Why wouldn't the ones that know just bet at other books and make more money...I suppose they do that to. And I suppose most of the college kids are paid to throw games and miss free throws at the proper moments right? And no info could ever get leaked or it would get shut down. Originally Posted by EASY_MONEY72
-
02-29-12 01:43 PM #13
Originally Posted by mrtsummit
Bulls
-
02-29-12 01:44 PM #14
We shall see. Originally Posted by ToPHeR
-
02-29-12 01:45 PM #15
Who's naive when the final score is posted?? Originally Posted by EASY_MONEY72
-
02-29-12 02:03 PM #16
that's absurd. no one has a record of 0-20 or something.
even bassmaster went 5-1 recently.
the reason why most people here lose? it's simple: THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE LOSE AT GAMBLING.
you can find the 20% if you look hard enough. know who to tail, who to fade. or just do your own goddamn research.
-
02-29-12 03:22 PM #17
this is a serious question
-
02-29-12 03:44 PM #18
Yesterday was TCU +8, and today coastal Carolina... It's as if books send.there own ppl to post these stupid picks so ppl get buried.... VMI was not gonna get crushed again by coastal for the 3rd time and ppl are riding coastal.Carolina.. unbelievable...
-
02-29-12 03:48 PM #19
-
02-29-12 03:48 PM #20
I hope to god you realize that when a book puts a line out they want 1,000 betting one way, and 1,000 betting the complete opposite. Originally Posted by EASY_MONEY72
-
02-29-12 03:49 PM #21
This! The question tonight is Marquette +1 a retarded play like TCU was Originally Posted by greenhippo
-
02-29-12 03:54 PM #22
Then you should be cleaning up instead of complaining since you know what sides to bet on these games. Originally Posted by drfunkmaster
-
02-29-12 03:56 PM #23
Greenhippo, do you post your plays? Yesterday on one of the threads I saw you say you have some ridiculous record going this year. Just wondering if you ever post. BOL.
Reply With Quote
