[tdforte22]

1) BET ID=377576570
Parlay (3 Teams) 02/22/12 18:46 ET
bet 20.00 to win 19.09 (paid 39.09) Result: Wager Won
Bucks(Milwaukee) 91
Bulls(Chicago) 110 02/22/12(20:10 ET)
Bulls(Chicago) -800
Celtics(Boston) 104
Thunder(OklahomaCity) 119 02/22/12(19:10 ET)
Thunder(OklahomaCity) -415
MichiganSt 66
MinnesotaU 61 02/22/12(20:35 ET)
MichiganSt -250

2) BET ID=377575493
Parlay (2 Teams) 02/22/12 18:42 ET
bet 30.00 to win 50.18 (paid 80.18) Result: Wager Won
Georgia 53
LSU 61 02/22/12(20:00 ET)
LSU -5.5
MichiganSt 66
MinnesotaU 61 02/22/12(20:35 ET)
MichiganSt -250

3) BET ID=377571409
Parlay (2 Teams) 02/22/12 18:25 ET
bet 30.00 to win 39.46 (paid 69.46) Result: Wager Won
Celtics(Boston) 104
Thunder(OklahomaCity) 119 02/22/12(19:10 ET)
Thunder(OklahomaCity) -470
WVirginia 44
NotreDame 71 02/22/12(19:05 ET)
NotreDame -3


Notre Dames been money as of late

[greenhippo]

Seen some of your posts on the board, you're better than betting straight MLs

[tdforte22]

I like to pick a few picks ATS and bump them up with a VERY confident ML

Take my picks today for example..

I was pretty damn sure MSU and OKC were gonna win

I really like ND and LSU ATS

So I combined-- Unless a wild upset its looking good for at least a small profit at 1-1

(disreguard the straight ML bet)

If the ND game hits and the LSU loses-- I'm still up around 10 bucks

LSU hits and ND doesn't-- I'm still up around 20 bucks

Both hits and I'm up 90

-----------------------

No one else likes this strategy?