Well ladies and gentlemen, I am of the minority here when it comes to smarts. I can't understand theory more than principle. Theory can't make grits unless you're a scientist like Einstein. Principle is grits bacon eggs and toast. Principle matters. Principle is all that matters to the layman. "Will this **ckin' thing work if i keep doing it?" That's all that really matters. I feel y'all. Ain't nothin' like getting too comfortable and putting up more than you should. People play them seperately and play them for the same amounts. Guys are mixing these plays in with their other ones on the same book are doing a big disservice to this type of wager. You don't mix a weeks worth of 70% picks in with games that you had to study to pick. It's not the same type of wager and shouldn't be treated as that kind of wager. It's the type of wager that needs appropriate consideration but in an exact like kind fashion each time.
But to show guys that i am sympathetic to their problems, I'll tell you what. As the front man, I'm gonna keep on trying these plays for us. I'll be the crash test dummie. But be advised:
I made my wager for St. Mary's-10 first half without regard/feelings/emotions about whether Mills was out for the season or if the carpet cleaning man couldn't make it. Look, bottom line, the criteria is there, so it gets played at the usual amount. I don't do any homework, or look at injury reports, and what have you. I just play em when I see em. For the same amount every time. Just like my baseball thing. Just like pouring my morning coffee.
It's there; it gets played. That's all the research I need.