Originally Posted by
Serbone
No, I completely understand, RLM.
There are weekends when you can find, say 4-5 good RLM's in NCAA football and bet that way and go 4-1. Other weekends, you go 1-4.
I get it, Bania.
BUT the data bases are different, individual, compiled, all LV, all offshore, % of bets, % of dollars.
What was the actual opening line? Not always sure. And when do you decide? Mid afternoon like the guy on this board did? 66%? From where?
I am just saying that if you handicap the game, players, coaches, experience, size, take Duke + 8. I did.
Duke is bigger and more experienced and are deeper at the guard spot and have superior coaching.
Sure Sullinger and Buford are outstanding and OSU could cover.
Reverse line movement and "the public" betting are something to look at, but you have to consider the source. I have seen where one source says 60% is on one team, and another says 65% is on the OTHER, same game.
And RLM? You cannot trust the data all the time, and sometimes you do not know if a huge bet skewed the numbers. Etc.
Too many newbies get into that and get buried. They hear "the public" is on one side and think that they should take the "other" so they are sharp. But the data? Where is it from?
Some times you look at online data and 75% take one side.
Then, uh, a local says 100% took the other side. So?
Not RLM but everyone is betting on Houston in NCAA football... 90+%... practically every game... they keep covering. The public.
DUKE + 8.