Originally Posted by
demens
Thats a very simpleton assumption you're making, be careful with that. The better play and more energy is not always a direct result of simply making a change. What many fans dont know is that often times the timing of when a coaching change is made is very deliberate and planned out in advance. A big factor that management considers is the schedule and they try to make the change when a friendly part of it comes up. So when a team gives that extra effort and plays with more energy it can actually result in a win since they are playing a weaker opponent. It gives off a perception of instant gratification and hopefully the teams can build momentum and continue to play better. That isn't always the case. Mike Fertello gave an awesome break down about this the other day when the Nets faced Indiana.
In Utahs case this doesn't exactly come off as something planned. Yeah everyone is saying that its been brewing but you have to think there is more truth to the reports of intense player arguments. Even if the management is denying it you really have to be obviously to think Jerry Sloan would just decide to quit like this, there was something very wrong behind the scenes and Utah is an organization that unlike most, knows how to keep their private shit behind closed doors.
I wouldn't go as far as saying their fans are gonna cheer for the Suns but there is no doubt they are pissed about this and they had Sloans back. Its no guarantee how the players will react to this as well, while they had problems with individuals i think the team as whole had Sloans back too. So while DWill might be happy and go for 40 tonight doesn;t mean that guys like Milsap, AK, Bell or CJ Miles are happy about this. Very stinky situation that can potentially cause a division in the team. Not saying Suns will trash them but this isn't the typical situation in which "usually" teams respond positive after a coaching change.