[Wojo]

I am not trying to pick on randizzle. I assume I get the real dizzle emails from his gmail account. That dizzle, the one mile-high, cappingfather, secret service (all dizzle) defend and promote.

That dizzle guaranteed all losses recently at $100 a unit. He had a couple of bad days and then Saturday, came up with a multitude of plays, including several 50 unit plays ($5000). He fails to list the line on many of the baseball plays when they are chalk. This is a VERY BAD sign if you are following a capper.

Dizzle went 2-9 for a loss of at least 16, 950 units ($16,950). Dizzle has bragged how he has 950 members. This means Dizzle now owes over 16 million dollars to his subscribers. That is not including his losses from when he first made his guarantee.

Guys, I have been doing this a long, long time. This guy is not a good person to follow. He is chasing after his losses and after Saturday he will be chasing them even more! If you can't see through this fake, well, then maybe this will be a good lesson for you.

This guy is the lowest of scam operators.

[allabout the $$$]

i will have to agree with u he rarely put out 25 or 50 unit plays and todays whole card is full of them
Members* Exclusive Plays Sunday, May 23, 2010
NBA&MLB PICKS *TYPE IN (RANDIZZLE14) ON TWITTER*

MLB:Cincy @ CLeveland


Time:1:05 pm est **

The Pick: (50 Units)*CLEVELAND -RL +1.5 (-130)*

(Non-Members email now & get full NBA&MLB members packages & "GUARANTEED PACKAGES" You get paid on my losses! No Risk Betting & "Guaranteed" Profits Every Day...)

MLB:Boston @ Philly

Time:1:35 pm est **


The Pick: (50 Units & 25 Units)*PHILLY -ML (50 Units) (-190) & PHILLY -RL (+115) (25 Units)*

MLB:Cubs @ Texas

Time:2:05 pm est **


The Pick: (50 Units)*TEXAS RANGERS -RL (+120)*

MLB:Milwaukee @ Minny


Time:2:10 pm est **

The Pick: (25 Units)*MINNY/MILWAUKEE UNDER10*

MLB:Padres @ Seattle

Time:4:10 pm est **


The Pick: (25 Units)*SEATTLE -RL (+150)*

NBA:LA Lakers @ Phoenix


Time:8:35 pm est *NBA 3 PLAYS*

The Pick: (50 Units & 50 Units & 25 Units)*Play sent at 7:25 pm :3 PLAYS/SIDE/TOTAL/1ST HALF*

MLB:NY Yankees @ NY Mets

Time:8:10 pm est *ESPN-POY*


The Pick: (50 Units)*Play sent at 7:25 pm*

[allabout the $$$]

after the week he has had this week who the hell is gonna lay 100 units on the phillies 50 units @2-1 odds u have to be kidding me i dont care if he hits every play today ive been around way to long and chasing is a terriblr thing to do to a bankroll

[allabout the $$$]

MLBetroit @ LA Dodgers
Time:4:10 pm est *2 Plays*ADDED
The Pick: (50 Units & 50 Units)*DETROIT -ML (+150) (50 Units) & DETROIT -RL +1.5 (-155) (50 Units)*

NBA:LA Lakers @ Phoenix
Time:8:35 pm est *NBA 3 PLAYS*

The Pick: (50 Units & 50 Units & 50 Units)*PHOENIX -1 (1STHALF) (50UNITS) / PHOENIX -ML (-121) (50UNITS) / LAKERS/PHOENIX UNDER110 (1STHALF) (50UNITS)*

MLB:NY Yankees @ NY Mets
Time:8:10 pm est *ESPN-POY*
The Pick: (50 Units)*NY YANKEES -ML (-140)*

[allabout the $$$]

chase central

[LLXC]

Does anybody believe a capper that guarantees anything?

[sharpcat]

Why do you people pay money for picks?????????

Why do you people pay money for somebody to tell you to use the martingale chase????????

Never pay for picks and never chase, please people save your money and stop feeding into these scumbag touts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Marginalis]

Unreal.

[allabout the $$$]

i will have to agree with u he rarely put out 25 or 50 unit plays and todays whole card is full of them
Members* Exclusive Plays Sunday, May 23, 2010
NBA&MLB PICKS *TYPE IN (RANDIZZLE14) ON TWITTER*

MLB:Cincy @ CLeveland

Time:1:05 pm est **

The Pick: (50 Units)*CLEVELAND -RL +1.5 (-130)*winner +5000

(Non-Members email now & get full NBA&MLB members packages & "GUARANTEED PACKAGES" You get paid on my losses! No Risk Betting & "Guaranteed" Profits Every Day...)

MLB:Boston @ Philly

Time:1:35 pm est **

The Pick: (50 Units & 25 Units)*PHILLY -ML (50 Units) (-190) & PHILLY -RL (+115) (25 Units)*
loser -9500
-2500

MLB:Cubs @ Texas

Time:2:05 pm est **

The Pick: (50 Units)*TEXAS RANGERS -RL (+120)*loser-5000

MLB:Milwaukee @ Minny

Time:2:10 pm est **

The Pick: (25 Units)*MINNY/MILWAUKEE UNDER10*winner +2500

MLB:Padres @ Seattle

Time:4:10 pm est **

The Pick: (25 Units)*SEATTLE -RL (+150)*

NBA:LA Lakers @ Phoenix

Time:8:35 pm est *NBA 3 PLAYS*

The Pick: (50 Units & 50 Units & 25 Units)*Play sent at 7:25 pm :3 PLAYS/SIDE/TOTAL/1ST HALF*

MLB:NY Yankees @ NY Mets

Time:8:10 pm est *ESPN-POY*

The Pick: (50 Units)*Play sent at 7:25 pm*

so far not a good day -9500 going into 4 oclock games

4 oclock games seattle-2500
detriot +12500
so plus 500 on the day so far

[brumbies]

Good fade material.

[Power Play]

Refresher course for all before applying

[Cannon]

The dizzle is a fizzle.

[STAY STRONG]

people who pay for picks are losers lol

[ChalkBets]

Oh look its the Randizzle "HATER" Committee
These c*8k suckers fail to mention how Randizzle14 made all his clients over $55,000 in profits this Football season .... Oh yeah they wont mention that from the GHOST ACCOUNTS

Just so everybody knows Randizzle14 (ON Twitter & Gamblersfinalword.Blogspot) has members up major money since August & all documented.

The Power Play account is a Ghost Account from a service that Randizzle14 destroyed during the summer months. Go look at his past post.

RANDIZZLE DOCUMENTED RECORDS :

*Randizzle's Documented Records 2010-11* Real Time Updated (1-21-11)
2010•CBB 14-12-1 (+$225)
2010•NBA 51-44-4 (-$6,900)
2010•NFL 81-50-7 (+$34,350)
2010•CFB 75-55-3 (+$23,050)
*CFB/NFL RUN* 69-33-3 (+$40,900)
*NBA RUN* 21-12-1 (+$4,000)
*CFB BOWL GAMES* 19-10-0 (+$8,800)
*NFL PLAYOFFS* 7-5-0 (+$2,700)
Email:RandizzlesPlays@Gmail.com

Business looks just fine for Randizzle14 & his members ...
Now keep hating while Dizzle makes us more money

[Power Play]

I'm a ghost account? Go back and read my posts and ahem dizzle ahem milehigh ahem jaguar ahem mr gator ahem bookie bill ahem chalkbets' posts and decide for yourselves.

[Power Play]

Jaguar/Mike Johnson/BP Source/Randizzle14 etc.. asking for money
RANDIZZLE14 : The Giant Colossal Thread of Crapola
Read learn. This stuff is funny though for some late night comedy.

[Power Play]

[ChuckDee]

I am not trying to pick on randizzle. I assume I get the real dizzle emails from his gmail account. That dizzle, the one mile-high, cappingfather, secret service (all dizzle) defend and promote.

That dizzle guaranteed all losses recently at $100 a unit. He had a couple of bad days and then Saturday, came up with a multitude of plays, including several 50 unit plays ($5000). He fails to list the line on many of the baseball plays when they are chalk. This is a VERY BAD sign if you are following a capper.

Dizzle went 2-9 for a loss of at least 16, 950 units ($16,950). Dizzle has bragged how he has 950 members. This means Dizzle now owes over 16 million dollars to his subscribers. That is not including his losses from when he first made his guarantee.

Guys, I have been doing this a long, long time. This guy is not a good person to follow. He is chasing after his losses and after Saturday he will be chasing them even more! If you can't see through this fake, well, then maybe this will be a good lesson for you.

This guy is the lowest of scam operators.

So... ChalkBets AKA ScamDizzle did these people get all there money back?

ChalkBets AKA ScamDizzle and there Scam Tactics. BUYER BEWARE!

[i4jelway7]

You ppl kill me, randizzle is documented, he is a winner, if you don't want to follow his plays then don't ... but don't come on here and complain about someone who is making money.... HATERS



http://hotfile.com/dl/98660379/a4670...where.mp3.html

[Wojo]

My original post stands. The guy is a chaser deluxe. You CANNOT deny that. The FACTS back me up.

Anybody who follows and believes in a scammer like Randizzle, who "monitors himself" - whooptofrickingdo- is somebody who will soon be losing money.

It appears the guy is using legit cappers' plays. Why would he wait so late in the day to release a play. AND so often after a HUGE line move against him has been made.

Randizzle continues to sink to the bottom. I'll send you the $300 to get monitored at the Sports Monitor or National Sports Monitor, Dizzle. If you win for a season, it's on me. If not, you pay me back.

Man up Dizzle! Be legit! Be honest! Don't Chase!!!!

[bruce0]

It's pretty clear on his site that the guarantee package is a separate package so you're assuming all the current members are guaranteed members owed money. One thing is for sure, he chases to no end. Seems like he incorporates a little labby but it is lacking discipline if so.

[Bradyd]

Chasing is not a problem if you know how to do it. I find it funny when people just blindly say "Don't Chase!" That's almost as bad as saying "Blindly Chase All Games". Sure chasing is risky, but carefully selecting your games to chase can produce amazing results. The problem is that most people don't know how to carefully pick games, chasing or not....

[Gee]

Chasing is not a problem if you know how to do it. I find it funny when people just blindly say "Don't Chase!" That's almost as bad as saying "Blindly Chase All Games". Sure chasing is risky, but carefully selecting your games to chase can produce amazing results. The problem is that most people don't know how to carefully pick games, chasing or not....

[Bradyd]

[Power Play]

If you hit 55% you WILL win money if you flat bet and money manage. You MAY win money chasing too but there's also a chance of bankruptcy under this method. If you you hit 50% you'll be bankrupt no matter your style but much faster if you chase. In fact I can't think of a winning percentage or a betting style where a player will be more successful long term BECAUSE they chase than if they just bet the same amount every game.

[Bradyd]

The problem is that most people don't hit 55%. That's asking a lot and still the possibility of going bankrupt. Chasing, if done right, doesn't require you to hit anywhere near 55% or even half of your plays. A good chase system consist of quality & consistent plays with a decent size bankroll. It's true that you can get bankrupt faster, but it's also true that the number of people who even hit 50% of their plays are rare...

[Wojo]

The problem is that most people don't hit 55%. That's asking a lot and still the possibility of going bankrupt. Chasing, if done right, doesn't require you to hit anywhere near 55% or even half of your plays. A good chase system consist of quality & consistent plays with a decent size bankroll. It's true that you can get bankrupt faster, but it's also true that the number of people who even hit 50% of their plays are rare...

Why not just play these "quality & consistent plays" you say to use on your chase plays?

So, the inference is the prior losing plays were not of "quality or consistency".

No offense, but I completely do not understand your post. To me, it makes no sense whatsoever.

[Bradyd]

Why not just play these "quality & consistent plays" you say to use on your chase plays?

So, the inference is the prior losing plays were not of "quality or consistency".

No offense, but I completely do not understand your post. To me, it makes no sense whatsoever.

None taken. Most people don't understand chasing because they never take the time to learn. You just ask why not play these quality of consistent plays straight up? Partly because of the same reason people rather play a dozen games a week as oppose to 1 o 2: More money. Chasing offers the opportunity to erase any losing streak that simply can't be done wagering the same units over and over again. With the latter strategy, you will always fall behind no matter what happens later on. With chasing, you literally erase the losing streak. There are systems on here that prove my point. Frankly, I could do a 2 week "show and tell" where everyone can see that properly chasing leads to more money..

[Power Play]

Chasing only works for people with unlimited bankrolls and a casino with no betting limits. Chasing assumes that a gambler can't lose say 5 times in a roll (which happens all the time even to Billy Walters). Chasers subscribes to the notion of the "gambler's fallacy" when they believe in the "due theory". Look up Martingale in wikipedia and read it. It's been proven that you can't increase expected value by chasing. Say you have a bankroll of $524,288 and you bet ONE DOLLAR per game to start off your chase. You will lose 20 games in the "chase system" before you go bankrupt. Now you say NO ONE loses twenty in a roll. Well the ESPN game streak for cash seen people win almost 30 in a roll and we all know if you can win 30 you can also lose 30(especially with your estimated winning percentage at 50%). Plus if you bet ONE DOLLAR how many CHASE SEQUENCE will it take for you to double your roll? (answer 524,288 times which equals much more than ONE MILLION individual bets.). Even if you live that long the law of probability states that with vegas juice added you will more likely LOSE 20 IN A ROLL before winning another $524,288 in this manner. So in short: chasing in no way improve expected value.

[Bradyd]

That's a beautiful story, but it's geared toward the same people I have already proclaimed who "don't chase correctly". Let me break it down for you: Chasing correctly does not involve randomly choosing a bunch of games just for the sake of betting and doing it 24/7, as the theory suggests. It involves carefully choosing which games you want to wager on, finding a consistent element to them all, and pick and choosing your spots on when to play them. That means finding plays with a high percentage of winning and adding "filters" to increase the odds. Sure it's possible to go on a huge losing streak. Anything is possible in sports betting. But calling chasing pointless based on such small odds (losing 30 in a row) defeats the purpose of betting on sports anyway. Let's face it, odds are that 90% of people will lose money betting on sports. Why bet on sports, or why even invest in the stock market or a business if anything less than a 100% chance of working worries you???

So in summary, it all depends on if you chase correctly. And chasing correctly could include being a "part time" chaser or a "conservative" chaser. Either way, it improves your chances of making more money if done correctly and not randomly as the theory suggests. I said it before and I will say it again: I will run a two-week trial for everyone to see, just to show that MY carefully crafted chase system works and it certainly doesn't require an unlimited bankroll. Sure there is a small percentage that it could fail, but there is also a small percentage that Microsoft could go bankrupt this year. Those are odds that I wouldn't bet on...

[Power Play]

You said "finding plays with a high percentage of winning and adding "filters" to increase the odds". If you (or any other gambler) can achieve this you might as well as flat bet 1% of your bankroll and likely achieve a profit with VERY little chance of bankruptcy. You said all along that gamblers that can hit 50% or lower can STILL WIN with a chase system. Not sure how your chase system can transform a 50% handicapper into a long term winner. Anyways please try out your system and see if it's successful. However I'm pretty sure if I just use all your chasing plays and flat bet them it will achieve the same (hopefully winning) results at much less risk. Anyways it's all cool just do your thing and we'll see what happens.

[Bradyd]

I guess we will see what happens. Give me a day or so to put this trial together. I think comparing and contrasting all the possibilities could be vital. (Ex. the results of wagering 1% vs. 5% vs. 10% vs 15% of a bankroll vs. a chase system) At the very least, I think this board will greatly benefit from the results...