[44 Mag]

Utah under 189. Loss.
GSW 1st half TT over 56. WIN.
Parlay: Utah -235 & GSW -340. Loss.


YTD:6-5 +0.20.

[BetThenSweat]

Good luck Mags. You are the man!

[44 Mag]

Good luck Mags. You are the man!

Yeah, LOL. I wish. I see you are still doing well, nice work this early in the season.

[BetThenSweat]

Yeah, LOL. I wish. I see you are still doing well, nice work this early in the season.

thanks

[44 Mag]

thanks

Remember, it's a Marathon, not a sprint. Continued luck on your "train, toot, toot".

[BetThenSweat]

Remember, it's a Marathon, not a sprint. Continued luck on your "train, toot, toot".

Thanks Mags, you are a great guy.

[RavensFan2k3]

Goodluck buddy!

[44 Mag]

Goodluck buddy!

Good to see you & thanks, I will need it.

[mitch51]

San Antonio-Washington under 201

Boston -2

Orlando +8.5

Portland +6

Sacramento +9.5

LA Clippers +8

Way too many games, I know. It's like over-eating at a buffet. Betting all to win a unit.


YTD: 11-6 +4.4 units

[44 Mag]

San Antonio-Washington under 201

Boston -2

Orlando +8.5

Portland +6

Sacramento +9.5

LA Clippers +8

Way too many games, I know. It's like over-eating at a buffet. Betting all to win a unit.

Wow, you will make a killing if they all win. There are some tough games there. BOL as always.

[mitch51]

I've been betting long enough to know to be happy if I'm up $1.00 at the end of the day.

[44 Mag]

I've been betting long enough to know to be happy if I'm up $1.00 at the end of the day.

[PorkChop]

San Antonio-Washington under 201

Boston -2

I would love to know when last time Celtics were a road favorite at someone not named Philadelphia in the past 2 years. Not many.

Id be all over Pacers here, if they weren't on a back to back off win

[mitch51]

I would love to know when last time Celtics were a road favorite at someone not named Philadelphia in the past 2 years. Not many.

Id be all over Pacers here, if they weren't on a back to back off win

No one had the Pacers yesterday, either. They were my top game and covered easily. Back to back can be a killer, but I could lose this game easily. Depends on what the Pacers have left in the tank.

[44 Mag]

]No one had the Pacers yesterday,[/B] either. They were my top game and covered easily. Back to back can be a killer, but I could lose this game easily. Depends on what the Pacers have left in the tank.

Hey, Hey, Hey, Hey......That was my number #1 pick yesterday, Indy UNDER 99.

[Conqueror]

1) I love your card.
2) You mentioned in another thread that the Warriors will go 72-10. The question is who is going to beat them? The only way the Warriors can lose is if Curry is kidnapped. Because even when he's on the bench, other players make 3's just by looking at him.

[44 Mag]

1) I love your card.
2) You mentioned in another thread that the Warriors will go 72-10. The question is who is going to beat them? The only way the Warriors can lose is if Curry is kidnapped. Because even when he's on the bench, other players make 3's just by looking at him.

72-10, that is the part of the season where they won't care, when they have the division, conference & home court advantage wrapped up & start resting guys for the playoffs. By the way, just to make sure, I am going: GSW 3.40 to make 1.00. Sounds better doesn't it. LOL. WIN.

[Conqueror]

72-10, that is the part of the season where they won't care, when they have the division, conference & home court advantage wrapped up & start resting guys for the playoffs. By the way, just to make sure, I am going: GSW 3.40 to make 1.00. Sounds better doesn't it. LOL.

That's true. I think they'll also lose a few games on purpose when they start getting death threats from Las Vegas.
Of course, 3.40 to make 1.00 with the Warriors at this time of season is sound investment. They've gone 50-4 SU in their L54 home games. Amazing!

[Conqueror]

Mag,

76ers TT UNDER 93.5 is really tempting. What do you think?

[PorkChop]

No one had the Pacers yesterday, either. They were my top game and covered easily. Back to back can be a killer, but I could lose this game easily. Depends on what the Pacers have left in the tank.

Um, right here pal.

I am playing them again tonight. Double-dipping is usually trouble..

[44 Mag]

Mag,

76ers TT UNDER 93.5 is really tempting. What do you think?

Ok, my opinion. While it is widely thought that Philly is the worst team in the league, which may be true, they are tinkering around with their lineup. Yes, on paper this looks like a play, however, Milwaukee has yet to hold one single team below that mark, and the only one even close hit 96, the others all eclipsed triple digits easily. The only time Philly, in their three games, has not scored more was against the vaunted Utah defense. Is Milwaukee as good defensively as Utah??? I think not. I would pass on that particular wager, but that's just me. BOL in whatever you decide & never go by me.

[44 Mag]

Um, right here pal.

I am playing them again tonight. Double-dipping is usually trouble..

PC, wishing you well, as I do not ever trust the Celtics. Sad to say.

[Conqueror]

Ok, my opinion. While it is widely thought that Philly is the worst team in the league, which may be true, they are tinkering around with their lineup. Yes, on paper this looks like a play, however, Milwaukee has yet to hold one single team below that mark, and the only one even close hit 96, the others all eclipsed triple digits easily. The only time Philly, in their three games, has not scored more was against the vaunted Utah defense. Is Milwaukee as good defensively as Utah??? I think not. I would pass on that particular wager, but that's just me. BOL in whatever you decide & never go by me.

That's why I asked for your take. Thanks. It's a pass for me.

[tatddy]

That's why I asked for your take. Thanks. It's a pass for me.

Don't pass take the over

[larry040681]

gsw under.. I'm glad that this is not baseball.. or else my jaw will drop seeing you wagering on under..

[44 Mag]

That's why I asked for your take. Thanks. It's a pass for me.

Don't pass take the over

That's why we need this guy. I was just explaining my reasoning for not going under (man hope I am correct). He always wins. (Tatddy).

[44 Mag]

gsw under.. I'm glad that this is not baseball.. or else my jaw will drop seeing you wagering on under..

[Fernburn74]

It's at 57.5now.

Im still liking this number I the they hit 60

or should i stay away cause I missed out on 56.5

[Conqueror]

Mag,

How did Utah fail to win? I didn't play Utah but I'm really annoyed. I thought you were always going to cash that parlay.
By the way, I'm dead already. It's my ghost that made this post.

[44 Mag]

It's at 57.5now.

Im still liking this number I the they hit 60

or should i stay away cause I missed out on 56.5

Just saw this. Hope you got it in.

[44 Mag]

Mag,

How did Utah fail to win? I didn't play Utah but I'm really annoyed. I thought you were always going to cash that parlay.
By the way, I'm dead already. It's my ghost that made this post.

I can't believe it either, losing at home to a mediocre Portland team, but that how it goes, makes me 2-2 on the day.

[mitch51]

I can't believe it either, losing at home to a mediocre Portland team, but that how it goes, makes me 2-2 on the day.

I was raised in Utah, I know how the Jazz usually roll. I was gonna take Portland on the money line then thought, Jesus. We have 8 months left, slow down...took Portland with the points, though.

[44 Mag]

I was raised in Utah, I know how the Jazz usually roll. I was gonna take Portland on the money line then thought, Jesus. We have 8 months left, slow down...took Portland with the points, though.

[mitch51]

Um, right here pal.

I am playing them again tonight. Double-dipping is usually trouble..

Nice call PorkChop, I was wrong on this game.