1. #1
    The Giant
    The Giant's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-21-12
    Posts: 21,480
    Betpoints: 233

    Better all-time coach: Gregg Popovich or Phil Jackson?


  2. #2
    No coincidences
    Baseball at The Corner
    No coincidences's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-18-10
    Posts: 76,300
    Betpoints: 16541

    Pops and it isn't even close.

    Better psychologist? Jackson.

  3. #3
    t-wizzle
    t-wizzle's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-18-09
    Posts: 38,099
    Betpoints: 2191

    Not a fair comparison.

    Pure basketball is Pop. NBA requires a ton of motivational skills and Jackson was the best.

  4. #4
    Scorpion
    Update your status
    Scorpion's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-04-05
    Posts: 7,797
    Betpoints: 15377

    Gregg Popovich


  5. #5
    Seaweed
    Update your status
    Seaweed's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-19-12
    Posts: 26,287
    Betpoints: 6952

    Jackson

  6. #6
    BigDofBA
    BigDofBA's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-30-09
    Posts: 19,311
    Betpoints: 2011

    Pop.

    Jackson had Kobe, Jordan, Shaquille, and Pippen.

    Pop has some stars but he makes all the role players play way better than they should.

  7. #7
    Roadtrip635
    Roadtrip635's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-07-10
    Posts: 6,129
    Betpoints: 21078

    Jackson had the best player on the planet each time.
    Pop has done it in different ways, grind it out half court game and uptempo spread it out style. Pop adapts to what he has and makes it work.

  8. #8
    mcdonae101
    mcdonae101's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-02-14
    Posts: 3,646
    Betpoints: 2617

    If u think Jackson, ur a fukin idiot. No wonder seaweed pikd him

  9. #9
    BigDofBA
    BigDofBA's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-30-09
    Posts: 19,311
    Betpoints: 2011

    Quote Originally Posted by Roadtrip635 View Post
    Jackson had the best player on the planet each time.
    Pop has done it in different ways, grind it out half court game and uptempo spread it out style. Pop adapts to what he has and makes it work.
    this.

    Maybe Jackson is a better "psychologist" but hell, if I had Jordan and Pippen and Kobe and Shaquille in their primes I would probably look like a good psychologist as well.

  10. #10
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Easily Pop.

    Jackson had more great players to work with.

    Popovich has won using different styles, he always caters his teams' playing style to its personnel rather than forcing a style that may not jive with his roster.

  11. #11
    Scorpion
    Update your status
    Scorpion's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-04-05
    Posts: 7,797
    Betpoints: 15377

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    Easily Pop.

    Jackson had more great players to work with.

    Popovich has won using different styles, he always caters his teams' playing style to its personnel rather than forcing a style that may not jive with his roster.

  12. #12
    Scorpion
    Update your status
    Scorpion's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-04-05
    Posts: 7,797
    Betpoints: 15377

    Pop A+++
    Jackson B-

  13. #13
    Roadtrip635
    Roadtrip635's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-07-10
    Posts: 6,129
    Betpoints: 21078

    Pop is the better psychologist as well, he gets everyone to buy in to "the system" and check their egos at the door.

  14. #14
    ChalkyDog
    Buy the ticket, take the ride.
    ChalkyDog's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-02-11
    Posts: 9,598
    Betpoints: 13

    I'm biased but give me Phil all day.

    Pop has my 100% respect and easily one of the guys I'd tell my kids about. I just think Phil is at the top and will be for a long long time.

  15. #15
    Romocide
    Romocide's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-14-11
    Posts: 1,404
    Betpoints: 3108

    You could argue that the superstars that Jackson coached made him.

    On the flip side,you could argue that Parker and Ginobli wouldn't have become half the stars that they did without Pop. Duncan was gonna be a star no matter who coached him.

    Gotta give the coaching nod to Pops easy.

  16. #16
    homie1975
    homie1975's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 12-24-13
    Posts: 14,877
    Betpoints: 11078

    What about auerbach

  17. #17
    homie1975
    homie1975's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 12-24-13
    Posts: 14,877
    Betpoints: 11078

    One thing to consider

    phil 11 rings
    jordan 6
    kobe 5
    shaq 4

    Phil 5 rings without jordan
    phil 6 rings without shaq and kobe

    jordan kobe shaq rings without phil = 1

  18. #18
    Cuse0323
    Cuse0323's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-09-09
    Posts: 30,169
    Betpoints: 87

    Pop all day. Phil is great but the players he had it's tough not to be. Pop molded teams into champions.

  19. #19
    Simon Gruber
    scientific thought and reasoning
    Simon Gruber's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-02-13
    Posts: 2,342
    Betpoints: 31

    I'll take Derek Fisher over both of em.

  20. #20
    smitch124
    smitch124's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 05-19-08
    Posts: 12,564
    Betpoints: 1547

    Well if Jackson wins with the Knicks, as the coach de facto in a puppet regime. He will be the best of all time. Without that, they are pretty even.

  21. #21
    The Giant
    The Giant's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-21-12
    Posts: 21,480
    Betpoints: 233

    Interesting debate.

    Everyone says Phil Jackson had superstars, but sometimes those are the hardest ones to coach. Shaq and Kobe hated each other, and still won titles. They didn't win any before him. Same with Michael Jordan, he didn't even sniff the finals until Jackson arrived.

    I don't really think there is a wrong answer between the two coaches.

  22. #22
    TheMoneyShot
    TheMoneyShot's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-14-07
    Posts: 28,681
    Betpoints: 23701

    It was a great run for Pop. I don't think he'll win anymore championships. Yes, San Antonio had an amazing playoff team this year. This won't ever happen again. Pop even knows it. Miami just wasn't hungry enough and didn't match up well with the Spurs.

    You can argue Jackson had plenty of superstars... but you still have to coach them in different areas of the game. I personally don't know how Jackson does it. Looks like just a simple guy. I know Jackson had more firepower than Pop... but you still have to coach that firepower. My pick would be Jackson.

  23. #23
    Seaweed
    Update your status
    Seaweed's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-19-12
    Posts: 26,287
    Betpoints: 6952


  24. #24
    akphidelt
    akphidelt's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-24-11
    Posts: 1,228
    Betpoints: 640

    Lol, Tim Duncan might be the best power forward/center in the history of the NBA and Parker one of the best PGs and future hall of famer... and you are blaming Phil for having great players and Pop for winning with nobodies? Pop and Phil are both great coaches with systems and styles that can make great players play within a system. But both require great players.

  25. #25
    Harold Baines
    Harold Baines's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-20-12
    Posts: 158
    Betpoints: 1249

    I'd take Pop hands down. To me, winning another ring at this stage of Duncan's career is pretty remarkable. The guy is one hell of a coach and also a great talent evaluator who knows how to make everything work without the ability to go out and buy the 'best' players.

  26. #26
    SeanL69
    SeanL69's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-31-14
    Posts: 60
    Betpoints: 90

    Is this the guy that benched Duncan with :30 sec in a game 6 championship game?

  27. #27
    jjgold
    jjgold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-20-05
    Posts: 388,190
    Betpoints: 10

    Pop ..landlside

  28. #28
    No coincidences
    Baseball at The Corner
    No coincidences's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-18-10
    Posts: 76,300
    Betpoints: 16541

    Quote Originally Posted by Roadtrip635 View Post
    Pop is the better psychologist as well, he gets everyone to buy in to "the system" and check their egos at the door.
    I don't know if I'd go that far. Phil somehow got a lot of egomaniac superstars to work together. That takes more than getting the more pedestrian stars to "buy in."

    I'm a huge Pops fan and think Jackson is vastly overrated, but I'll give credit where credit is due when it comes to this.

  29. #29
    No coincidences
    Baseball at The Corner
    No coincidences's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-18-10
    Posts: 76,300
    Betpoints: 16541

    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    Interesting debate.

    Everyone says Phil Jackson had superstars, but sometimes those are the hardest ones to coach. Shaq and Kobe hated each other, and still won titles. They didn't win any before him. Same with Michael Jordan, he didn't even sniff the finals until Jackson arrived.

    I don't really think there is a wrong answer between the two coaches.
    Exactly.

  30. #30
    jjgold
    jjgold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-20-05
    Posts: 388,190
    Betpoints: 10

    Pop much better person
    zero ego

    Jackson complete opposite

Top