1. #316
    Ratzz
    Ratzz's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-07-10
    Posts: 8,965

    *Feb 8th

    69) SAS__–1.5__1ST QTR* in Charlotte

    Spurs have been slow starters of late..
    maybe time to turn that around

  2. #317
    Ratzz
    Ratzz's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-07-10
    Posts: 8,965

    maybe the Spurs are just washed up...

    maybe i have to scratch them off the list altogether..

    no team with starters over 35...

    looks like they just hit that wall... where they are useless..

  3. #318
    blerpblerp
    blerpblerp's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-17-14
    Posts: 88
    Betpoints: 284

    IMO they are still a good bet vs the right opponent.

    The Bobcats' play has improved of late....The Spurs are still 2nd in the NBA in 1st Q margin even with their recent injuries and poor starts.

  4. #319
    Trep
    Trep's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-24-13
    Posts: 375
    Betpoints: 2842

    Was pretty happy to get that line at -1 earlier in the day. Thought it was a massive bargain. Guess it didn't turn out as expected

  5. #320
    Ratzz
    Ratzz's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-07-10
    Posts: 8,965

    *Feb 9th

    70) LAK__+0.5__1ST QTR* vs. Chicago

    71) LAK__+3__GAME* vs. Chicago

    Improved Lakers.. coming home

  6. #321
    riffraff24
    ...and out come the wolves
    riffraff24's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-20-11
    Posts: 7,234
    Betpoints: 55

    Quote Originally Posted by Ratzz View Post
    *Feb 9th

    70) LAK__+0.5__1ST QTR* vs. Chicago

    71) LAK__+3__GAME* vs. Chicago

    Improved Lakers.. coming home
    Ratzz I spit coffee all over my macbook when i read this. GL man

  7. #322
    MikeyD323
    MikeyD323's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-09-12
    Posts: 1,454
    Betpoints: 387

    Quote Originally Posted by Ratzz View Post
    *Feb 9th

    70) LAK__+0.5__1ST QTR* vs. Chicago

    71) LAK__+3__GAME* vs. Chicago

    Improved Lakers.. coming home
    Geeze. Balls

  8. #323
    Ratzz
    Ratzz's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-07-10
    Posts: 8,965

    it's Nash.

    I totally spaced on his presence and effect, i was just looking at numbers.

    if NASH is not in, Lakers win by 10.
    in 21 minutes of playing time, Nash was (–24)

    the Lakers lost more than a point per minute with him in there.

    i had devised games with disqualifying factors like: "No starters 36 or over"
    and i forgot about that.

    this game would have been disqualified based on that rule.
    Last edited by Ratzz; 02-09-14 at 05:50 PM.

  9. #324
    Ratzz
    Ratzz's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-07-10
    Posts: 8,965

    Feb 9th

    72) CLE__+3.5__Game* vs. Memphis

  10. #325
    Ratzz
    Ratzz's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-07-10
    Posts: 8,965

    Feb 9th

    73) PHI__+16__GAME**vs. the L.A. Clippers

  11. #326
    boydako13
    boydako13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-08-13
    Posts: 2,051
    Betpoints: 1572

    Do u have pick for 1st qtr of clip/phi game?

  12. #327
    Ratzz
    Ratzz's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-07-10
    Posts: 8,965

    Feb 9th

    74) PHI__+9.5__1ST HALF* vs. the L.A. Clippers


  13. #328
    tonywayne
    tonywayne's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-05-13
    Posts: 229
    Betpoints: 244

    Yikes. I admire anyone that was willing to bet LA to cover by 30+ points...

  14. #329
    Ratzz
    Ratzz's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-07-10
    Posts: 8,965

    Feb 10th

    75) TOR__–4__1ST HALF* vs. New orleans

  15. #330
    Ratzz
    Ratzz's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-07-10
    Posts: 8,965

    Feb 10th

    76) HOU__–1__1ST QTR* vs. Minnesota

  16. #331
    Ro0k
    Ro0k's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-04-14
    Posts: 678
    Betpoints: 2492

    Quote Originally Posted by Ratzz View Post
    Feb 10th

    76) HOU__–1__1ST QTR* vs. Minnesota
    Very nice, I was on this as well.

First ... 78910
Top